“…While in spiralling across a variety of scales of time and space, power and personhood, and methods and methodologies, they variously touch on, nudge and rework aspects of the following: educator and learner questions, concepts, beliefs, values, adaptive capacities, networks, actions, interactions and intra-actions, and contexts for climate change education (e.g. Boyd and Osbahr 2010;Shepardson et al 2012;Brownlee, Powell, and Hallo 2013;Shealy et al 2019;Devine-Wright, Devine-Wright, and Fleming 2004;Sezen-Barrie, Miller-Rushing, and Hufnagel 2019a;cf. Dove 1996;Leiserowitz 2006;Whitmarsh 2009;Porter, Weaver, and Raptis 2012;Blum et al 2013;€ Ohman and € Ohman 2013;Plutzer et al 2016;Kolleck et al 2017;Verlie and CRR 15 2018), the influence of everyday life, cultural to transcultural and subcultural norms, class, gender, age, personal beliefs, emotions, imagery and metaphors, information seeking and representations, consensus claims, risk perception, coping strategies, friends, parents and family in building or dissipating concern (Stern€ ang and Lundholm 2012; Boyd and Osbahr 2010;Kenis and Mathijs 2012;Niebert and Gropengiesser 2013;Stevenson, Peterson, and Bondell 2019;cf.…”