1982
DOI: 10.3102/01623737004003363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High School Students in the Labor Force: Some Costs and Benefits to Schooling and Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to the causal placement of the out-of-school behavior variables in our model (between values and school outcomes), a number of researchers have suggested that values as measured by students' achievement motivation, the importance students place on education, parental interest, and proeducational family inputs are potentially important determinants of student behaviors such as good study habits and time spent watching television (Benson et al, 1980;Entwistle & Brennan, 1971). Research has also shown that out-of-school behaviors involving homework (Coleman et al, 1982a;Rock, Goertz, Ekstrom, Pollack, & Hilton, 1984;Walberg, 1984), television (Milne, Myers, Ellman, & Ginsburg, 1985), and employment (D'Amico, 1984;Greenberger, 1983;Steinberg, Greenberger, Garduque, & McAuliffe, 1982) affect school outcomes.…”
Section: Family Background and Individual Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…With regard to the causal placement of the out-of-school behavior variables in our model (between values and school outcomes), a number of researchers have suggested that values as measured by students' achievement motivation, the importance students place on education, parental interest, and proeducational family inputs are potentially important determinants of student behaviors such as good study habits and time spent watching television (Benson et al, 1980;Entwistle & Brennan, 1971). Research has also shown that out-of-school behaviors involving homework (Coleman et al, 1982a;Rock, Goertz, Ekstrom, Pollack, & Hilton, 1984;Walberg, 1984), television (Milne, Myers, Ellman, & Ginsburg, 1985), and employment (D'Amico, 1984;Greenberger, 1983;Steinberg, Greenberger, Garduque, & McAuliffe, 1982) affect school outcomes.…”
Section: Family Background and Individual Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The little available evidence tends to support this line of reasoning. Steinberg, Greenberger, Garduque, and McAuliffe (1982) found that first-time high school workers spent less time on homework than nonworkers, while skipping school more often, and receiving lower grades. D'Amico (1984) also found that extensive work involvement resulted in lessened study time and free time at school.…”
Section: The Potential Negative Effects Of Raising Standardsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Some research places the threshold at about 14 hours per week and associates longer hours with negative personal and academic outcomes (Steinberg, Greenberger, Garduque, & McAuliffe, 1982) cited in (Schoenhals et al, 1998). Advantages generally outweigh disadvantages for students who are employed for relatively few hours during any week.…”
Section: International Literature About Young Employees In Developed mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a general threshold of hours worked below which students gain positive educational and personal outcomes. Some research places the threshold at about 14 hours per week and associates longer hours with negative personal and academic outcomes (Steinberg, Greenberger, Garduque, & McAuliffe, 1982) cited in (Schoenhals et al, 1998). John Warren placed the threshold at 10 hours a week (Warren, 2002: 368-369).…”
Section: International Literature About Young Employees In Developed mentioning
confidence: 99%