2015
DOI: 10.1002/clc.22392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High‐Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T in Stable Patients Undergoing Pharmacological Stress Testing

Abstract: Background: Acute changes in high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT) are induced by myocardial ischemia during exercise stress testing, but there are no reports of pharmacological stress testing. Hypothesis: The pattern of troponin release by myocardial ischemia-induced pharmacological stress testing differs according to the ischemic burden in stable patients. Methods: In total, 250 patients with suspected coronary artery disease underwent pharmacological stress magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The amount and de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our real-world, non-selected cohort of patients with normal or slightly increased levels of hs-cTnT, submitted for diagnostic purposes to an exercise or a pharmacological stress test, we documented a significant release of the biomarker that was not limited to patients with stress-induced ischaemia and obstructive CAD, but that also occurred in patients with negative tests and normal coronary arteries. In agreement with a previous report, 19 troponin release was more pronounced after exercise and dobutamine stress, responsible for a greater increase in heart rate, blood pressure and cardiac inotropism, as compared with dipyridamole stress, mainly acting by a mechanism of inappropriate vasodilation. CAD enhanced myocardial release of troponin, which, however, was documented also in patients without significant CAD.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiessupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In our real-world, non-selected cohort of patients with normal or slightly increased levels of hs-cTnT, submitted for diagnostic purposes to an exercise or a pharmacological stress test, we documented a significant release of the biomarker that was not limited to patients with stress-induced ischaemia and obstructive CAD, but that also occurred in patients with negative tests and normal coronary arteries. In agreement with a previous report, 19 troponin release was more pronounced after exercise and dobutamine stress, responsible for a greater increase in heart rate, blood pressure and cardiac inotropism, as compared with dipyridamole stress, mainly acting by a mechanism of inappropriate vasodilation. CAD enhanced myocardial release of troponin, which, however, was documented also in patients without significant CAD.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiessupporting
confidence: 93%
“…After screening titles and abstracts of articles, 57 records were reviewed with full texts. Finally, 11 studies were included in the meta-analysis, 3,5,6,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] and 46 were excluded because of incomplete or overlapping data. The Figure shows details of the selection process for studies.…”
Section: Selection Of Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…History of diabetes, CAD, lower creatinine clearance and ejection fraction were more frequently found in patients with moderate-to-severe ischemia. 16 Other studies demonstrating cTnI release in individuals with heart failure 31 submitted to exercise or in marathon runners with exercise-induced high blood pressure 32 could also indicate a role for the presence of those markers in different left ventricular overload situations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One important topic is their elevation in transient ischemia during physical or pharmacological stress tests. 12 - 16 The present study was aimed at assessing the kinetics of high-sensitivity troponin T (hscTnT) by use of serial measurements after an exercise test (ET) performed in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, and at comparing the changes in that biomarker levels on abnormal versus normal tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%