2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-555x(03)00150-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High spatial resolution hyperspectral mapping of in-stream habitats, depths, and woody debris in mountain streams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
163
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
163
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Detailed bathymetry maps of inland water bodies are essential for simulating flow dynamics and forecasting flood hazard (Conner and Tonina, 2014;Gichamo et al, 2012;Schäppi et al, 2010), predicting sediment transport and streambed morphological evolution (Manley and Singer, 2008;Nitsche et al, 2007;Rovira et al, 2005;Snellen et al, 2011), and monitoring instream habitats (Brown and Blondel, 2009;Powers et al, 2015;Strayer et al, 2006;Walker and Alford, 2016). Whereas exposed floodplain areas can be directly monitored from aerial surveys, riverbed topography is not directly observable from airborne or space-borne methods (Alsdorf et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Detailed bathymetry maps of inland water bodies are essential for simulating flow dynamics and forecasting flood hazard (Conner and Tonina, 2014;Gichamo et al, 2012;Schäppi et al, 2010), predicting sediment transport and streambed morphological evolution (Manley and Singer, 2008;Nitsche et al, 2007;Rovira et al, 2005;Snellen et al, 2011), and monitoring instream habitats (Brown and Blondel, 2009;Powers et al, 2015;Strayer et al, 2006;Walker and Alford, 2016). Whereas exposed floodplain areas can be directly monitored from aerial surveys, riverbed topography is not directly observable from airborne or space-borne methods (Alsdorf et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, remote sensing imagery from satellites, such as Landsat (Liceaga-Correa and Euan-Avila, 2002), QuickBird (Lyons et al, 2011), IKONOS (Stumpf et al, 2003), WorldView-2 (Hamylton et al, 2015;Lee et al, 2011), and aircrafts (Carbonneau et al, 2006;Marcus et al, 2003), has been used to monitor the bathymetry of inland water bodies. However, bathymetry can only be derived from optical imagery when water is very clear and shallow, the sediment is comparatively homogeneous, and atmospheric conditions are favorable (Legleiter et al, 2009;Lyzenga, 1981;Lyzenga et al, 2006;Overstreet and Legleiter, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both 4-and 7-unit classifications were generated, and an accuracy assessment including all pixels not used as training sites resulted in low overall accuracies of 64.7% and 47.5%, respectively (Table 3). Although Marcus et al (2003) obtained 85.5% accuracy by applying a 2 m buffer to field map polygons, the reduction in accuracy incurred when transitional boundary zones between habitat units are not excluded suggests that conventional image classification procedures might be inadequate for characterizing the full continuum of fluvial form. Supervised classifications are only as valid as the training sites from which they are derived, and sophisticated technology can not resolve the ambiguity among similar in-stream habitats.…”
Section: Crisp Supervised Classification Of In-stream Habitat: Lamarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This stream has been the site of prior research into remote mapping of fluvial environments and detailed descriptions of the study area are provided in Marcus et al (2003) and Legleiter (2003). Both data sets featured the fine spatial resolution required for small mountain streams, but provided different levels of spectral detail and radiometric precision (Table 1).…”
Section: Remotely Sensed Data and Image Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example such robots could help locate hazardous chemical leaks [2], function as self propelled inspection devices [3], and search for victims in disaster sites [4,5,6]. Limbless robots that use their bodies to move appear better suited to navigate complex terrains than traditional wheeled [7,8,9,10] and legged [11,12,13,14,15,16,17] robots which are often impeded by the size or shape of their appendages which can result in entrapment or failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%