2023
DOI: 10.1038/s43246-023-00331-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-speed hybrid complementary ring oscillators based on solution-processed organic and amorphous metal oxide semiconductors

Abstract: Solution-processed single-crystal organic semiconductors (OSCs) and amorphous metal oxide semiconductors (MOSs) are promising for high-mobility p- and n-channel thin-film transistors (TFTs), respectively. Organic−inorganic hybrid complementary circuits hence have great potential to satisfy practical requirements. However, some chemical incompatibilities between OSCs and MOSs, such as heat and chemical resistance, make it difficult to rationally integrate TFTs based on solution-processed OSC and MOS onto the sa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Signal delay per stage (t d ) was calculated as t d = 1/(2nf osc ), where n is the number of the inverter stages, f osc is the measured oscillation frequency. The delay t d was 25 ms at V DD = 5 V and 410 ms at V DD = 0.2 V. Signal delay per stage of our devices was compared with previous reports including vacuum process and unipolar-based ring oscillators, 21,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] as summarized in Fig. 5.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Signal delay per stage (t d ) was calculated as t d = 1/(2nf osc ), where n is the number of the inverter stages, f osc is the measured oscillation frequency. The delay t d was 25 ms at V DD = 5 V and 410 ms at V DD = 0.2 V. Signal delay per stage of our devices was compared with previous reports including vacuum process and unipolar-based ring oscillators, 21,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] as summarized in Fig. 5.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%