The Mathematics of Finite Elements and Applications 1985
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-747255-3.50006-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Speed Inviscid Compressible Flow by the Finite Element Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
9

Year Published

1986
1986
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
17
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Which would be the best depends on the physical conditions of the problem. Continuative boundary conditions comprise zero normal derivatives at the 'open' boundary and are intended to represent a smooth continuation of the flow through the boundary, and is used for example in studies by Zienkiewicz et al (1985) and Peraire (1986). However, this type of boundary conditions has no strong physical basis, but rather is a mathematical statement which in some situations provides the desired flow behaviour.…”
Section: Nonlocal Continuum Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Which would be the best depends on the physical conditions of the problem. Continuative boundary conditions comprise zero normal derivatives at the 'open' boundary and are intended to represent a smooth continuation of the flow through the boundary, and is used for example in studies by Zienkiewicz et al (1985) and Peraire (1986). However, this type of boundary conditions has no strong physical basis, but rather is a mathematical statement which in some situations provides the desired flow behaviour.…”
Section: Nonlocal Continuum Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will be assumed that the discretization employs p nodes, which need not be numbered sequentially and are such that node J is located at x 1 = x 1J . Elements, joining neighbouring nodes, are also numbered and the standard linear finite-element shape function associated with node J is denoted by N J (x 1 ) [26]. Finite-dimensional subspaces T (p) and W (p) of the trial and weighting function spaces, respectively, are defined by…”
Section: Galerkin Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both integrals are evaluated using the standard finite-element approach of summing the contributions from the individual elements [26]. On the left-hand side, the resulting element integrals are evaluated exactly.…”
Section: Galerkin Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The finite element method for (13), ( 14), (15) leads to the approximation ψ(x, y) ≈ ψ h (x, y) = j ψ h j u h j (x, y). Here ψ h j are the approximate values of the solution in the nodes of the triangular mesh, u h j (x, y) are the basic functions of piecewise-linear interpolation [9] on the mesh, ψ h (x, y) the finite element approximation of the solution. The summation is over all nodes of the mesh, including boundary nodes with the values of the solution prescribed by ( 14) and (15).…”
Section: Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%