2017
DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2016.2606551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Speed <italic>In Situ</italic> Observation System for Sonoporation of Cells With Size- and Position-Controlled Microbubbles

Abstract: Abstract-A high-speed in situ microscopic observation system developed for basic studies on mechanisms of sonoporation is introduced in this paper. The main part of the system is an inverted-type fluorescence microscope, and a high-speed camera of 20 MHz in maximum framing rate was used to visualize dynamics of cavitation bubbles that causes a sonoporation effect. Differential interference contrast and fluorescence techniques were used for sensitive visualization of cell changes during sonoporation. The system… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. Direct impingement: Even at moderate amplitudes of oscillation, the acceleration of the bubble wall may be sufficient to impose significant forces on nearby surfaces, easily deforming fragile structures such as biological cell membranes (van Wamel et al 2006;Kudo 2017) and blood vessel walls (Chen et al 2011). 2.…”
Section: Mechanical Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. Direct impingement: Even at moderate amplitudes of oscillation, the acceleration of the bubble wall may be sufficient to impose significant forces on nearby surfaces, easily deforming fragile structures such as biological cell membranes (van Wamel et al 2006;Kudo 2017) and blood vessel walls (Chen et al 2011). 2.…”
Section: Mechanical Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of particular importance is the proper design of an acoustic exposure platform whose in situ ultrasound field pressure and various intensity measures are well characterized as stipulated in bioeffect experiment reporting guidelines [19]. Based on this premise, acoustically coupled live cell imaging platforms have been constructed to gain insight into cellular morphology changes during ultrasound pulsing [20], [21] and acoustic cavitation [22]- [24]. Fluorescent and confocal imaging modes of these platforms have also been used to observe sonoporationinduced cytostructural remodeling [25], [26], intercellular interactions [27], calcium ion influx [28]- [30], transmembrane depolarization [31], and reactive oxygen species changes [32].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 During camera recording, the materials were subjected to ultrasound pulses, each consisting of 3 cycles with a centre transmitting frequency of 1 MHz and a peak-negative pressure of 200 kPa, from a laboratoryassembled single-element transducer. 9,10 The signal fed into the transducer was generated by an AFG320 arbitrary function generator (Sony-Tektronix, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan) and amplified by a UOD-WB-1000 wide-band power amplifier (TOKIN Corporation, Shiroishi, Miyagi, Japan).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%