2020
DOI: 10.2514/1.a34522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Speed Schlieren Analysis of Retropropulsion Jet in Mach 10 Flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences between experimental and numerical pressure values may be caused by numerical limitations in correctly capturing the redirection of the jet flow. Furthermore, unsteady effects were observed in the flowfield similar to those observed by Bathel et al [13], which may also lead to discrepancies between experiments and the steady-state RANS computations.…”
Section: Cfd Validationsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The differences between experimental and numerical pressure values may be caused by numerical limitations in correctly capturing the redirection of the jet flow. Furthermore, unsteady effects were observed in the flowfield similar to those observed by Bathel et al [13], which may also lead to discrepancies between experiments and the steady-state RANS computations.…”
Section: Cfd Validationsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…A Photron Fastcam SA-X2 captured these images at a frequency of 12,500 Hz, an exposure time of 2.5 μs, and with a resolution of 1024 × 1024 pixel. The locations of bow shock, contact surface, terminal shock, and triple point were manually extracted from the coefficient of variant images similar to a study on high-speed schlieren of SRP flows by Bathel et al [13]. These images were produced from the captured high-speed schlieren images of each run.…”
Section: A Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%