2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High strain rate compressive properties of bovine muscle tissue determined using a split Hopkinson bar apparatus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
71
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, Figure 4 shows that the SHPB experimental true stressstrain curve actually measures the first invariant of stress, rather than the uniaxial loading-direction stress-strain behavior. While most other studies [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] simply present the experimental results, Figure 3 shows that such a representation of the mechanical response of a biomaterial would underestimate the uniaxial response, which is relevant for FE modeling simulation of real world boundary value problems (BVPs). Hence, a use of the SHPB experimental result alone would be erroneous if it not coupled with FE-type modeling to assess the uniaxial behavior.…”
Section: Representative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, Figure 4 shows that the SHPB experimental true stressstrain curve actually measures the first invariant of stress, rather than the uniaxial loading-direction stress-strain behavior. While most other studies [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] simply present the experimental results, Figure 3 shows that such a representation of the mechanical response of a biomaterial would underestimate the uniaxial response, which is relevant for FE modeling simulation of real world boundary value problems (BVPs). Hence, a use of the SHPB experimental result alone would be erroneous if it not coupled with FE-type modeling to assess the uniaxial behavior.…”
Section: Representative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that SHPB testing has three major flaws associated with it [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] . The first and most significant one is the material inertial effect, which shows up in the high strain rate mechanical response of a biomaterial specimen as an initial spike.…”
Section: Background On Split-hopkinson Pressure Bar (Shpb) and Internmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Time post-mortem prior to testing: Van Sligtenhorst et al (2006) showed that there was a significant difference in the mechanical properties of specimens 1.5 and 3.5 hours post mortem when compared to specimens 5,6,7,9 and 27 hours post-mortem; this was largely supported by Van Loocke et al (2006) who suggested that dehydration of tissues may lead to an increased stiffness.…”
Section: Structure and Composition Of Organic Muscle Tissuementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Consequently, very few studies presented are of human tissues (Chawla et al, 2009;Balaraman et al, 2012). Much more of the muscle characterisation research published being obtained from testing on more accessible organic animal specimens such as bovine (McElhaney, 1966;Van Sligtenhorst et al, 2006) or porcine sources (Song et al, 2007;Van Loocke et al, 2006, 2009. It is suggested that these tissues exhibit anatomically and biologically similar structures to humans (Douglas, 1972;Snedeker et al, 2005).…”
Section: Structure and Composition Of Organic Muscle Tissuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation