1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf01573707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High surface hydrophobicity ofStaphylococcus aureus as revealed by hydrophobic interaction chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of previous studies of the relationship between the presence of protein A and hydrophobicity have been ambiguous (10,14). Those in the present study demonstrated that two protein A-deficient strains and their parent protein A-positive strains were hydrophobic.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…The results of previous studies of the relationship between the presence of protein A and hydrophobicity have been ambiguous (10,14). Those in the present study demonstrated that two protein A-deficient strains and their parent protein A-positive strains were hydrophobic.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…S. aweus grown exponentially but relatively slowly (DT 60 min) was far less hydrophobic, particularly when iron-stressed, than when grown exponentially but relatively quickly (DT 24 min). A correlation was found as cell-bound PrA, a significant contributor to SH [13], was reduced in the slow-grown phenotypes, especially in the TSB -Fe cocci. Significantly, the latter had CA values N 5-6" less than those of human PMN (18-19" [2,14]), implying, from interfacial tension principles [2], that it would be the least easily phagocytosed of the phenotypes.…”
Section: Sh and Pra Expressionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The most common methods to measure microbial surface hydrophobicity are; partitioning in aqueous two phase systems, [16] hydrophobic interaction chromatography, [17] salt aggregation, [18] polystyrene microsphere attachment, [19] contact angle measurements, [9] and microbial adhesion to hydrocarbons. The most common methods to measure microbial surface hydrophobicity are; partitioning in aqueous two phase systems, [16] hydrophobic interaction chromatography, [17] salt aggregation, [18] polystyrene microsphere attachment, [19] contact angle measurements, [9] and microbial adhesion to hydrocarbons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%