1994
DOI: 10.1080/10826079408013384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Temperature GPC with a Single Capillary Viscometer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To check the GPC system, especially the performance of the viscometric detector and the refractometer "prototype #4", we compared the polystyrene MarkHouwink coefficients obtained using the TSK narrow standards, represented in Figure 9, and the one obtained with a linear broad molecular weight polymer, polystyrene Dow 1683 represented in Figure 10, where interdetector volume correction was applied using the exact interdetector volume. Similar Mark-Houwink exponents a were obtained (0.715 and 0.717), confirming the reliability of this GPC instrument and the parameters used for calibration [9]. …”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…To check the GPC system, especially the performance of the viscometric detector and the refractometer "prototype #4", we compared the polystyrene MarkHouwink coefficients obtained using the TSK narrow standards, represented in Figure 9, and the one obtained with a linear broad molecular weight polymer, polystyrene Dow 1683 represented in Figure 10, where interdetector volume correction was applied using the exact interdetector volume. Similar Mark-Houwink exponents a were obtained (0.715 and 0.717), confirming the reliability of this GPC instrument and the parameters used for calibration [9]. …”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…6,10,18,20 This secondary peak was not present in the response of the DRI and VD detectors, which is consistent with earlier on-line viscometer and SEC studies. [3][4][5][6][7]9,10 The difference in response between the LSD and the VD detectors is not surprising because it reflects the difference in sensitivity. The LSD signal is proportional to cM (c, concentration; M, molecular weight), while the VD response is proportional to cM ␣ where ␣ is the Mark-Houwink parameter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Details of the SCV detector, hardware and software, were described elsewhere. 15 The signal of the viscometer detector depends on the intrinsic viscosity and on the concentration of the solution. Hence, to obtain a constant signal-tonoise ratio, the concentration of the samples was calculated so that [] c ϭ 0.1.…”
Section: Viscometrymentioning
confidence: 99%