2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.07.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High temperature mechanical properties of Mg–Y2O3 composite: Competition between texture and reinforcement contributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar higher stress exponent values have been reported for creep in Mg dispersed with 0.05% MgO [15] which inhibited diffusional creep. Also, stress exponent values in the range 916 have been observed in the higher stress range during creep of magnesium strengthened with high value fractions of yttria dispersoids [16,17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Similar higher stress exponent values have been reported for creep in Mg dispersed with 0.05% MgO [15] which inhibited diffusional creep. Also, stress exponent values in the range 916 have been observed in the higher stress range during creep of magnesium strengthened with high value fractions of yttria dispersoids [16,17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This texture reduction is due to the presence of HA particles, which stimulate the recrystallization of randomly-oriented grains by particle stimulation nucleation (PSN) mechanism. In the research performed by Garcés et al [52], the texture of Mg matrix was also vanished by reinforcement particles. In addition, Campo et al [24] found that the reinforcement particles tend to prevent the appearance of the texture produced by the extrusion process.…”
Section: Fig 11mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…It is notable that in most of the cases reported before, grain boundary strengthening effect has been the major source of strengthening in the composites prepared by the powder metallurgy process, due to the small matrix grain size [31,32]. In the present study, however, the monolithic and composite materials had similar grain sizes, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 41%