1983
DOI: 10.1002/aic.690290618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High‐temperature mutual solubilities of hydrocarbons and water. Part I: Benzene, cyclohexane andn‐hexane

Abstract: The mutual solubilities at the three-phase equilibrium pressure of three C6 hydrocarbons (benzene, cyclohexane and n-hexane) and water have been experimentally investigated up to 482 K. A thermodynamic analysis of these new measurements and of critically selected literature data has been carried out up to the three-phase critical end point. Information is also provided on the two-phase critical locus, The solubility of hydrocarbons in water has been used to calculate Henry's constants, while the solubility of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
218
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 264 publications
(234 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
16
218
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, even if these contributions could be included in the model in an explicit way, we did not do that because the purpose of this work was focused on the capability of this equation of state in its original form to represent the experimentally observed complex phase behavior developed by this mixture and compare its performance against another thermodynamic model. In this context, it should be mentioned that all phase equilibrium predictions with this equation were obtained using binary interaction parameters taken from the literature, which had previously been fitted from binary vapor-liquid equilibrium data, instead of using other interaction parameters fitted from three phase equilibrium data, as done, for instance, by Nutakki [31] to modeling the three-phase binary water-hydrocarbon systems data of Brady et al [32] and Tsonopoulos and Wilson [33] with the Schmidt-Wenzel EoS in order to determine the interaction parameters between the hydrocarbon and water in the hydrocarbon liquid and aqueous phases. The latter is important because once the interaction parameters have been fitted at three phase equilibrium conditions, there is a risk to use them to predict the phase behavior of a given system at different conditions at which the interaction parameters were determined, so that the prediction may fail and/or give physical meaningless results.…”
Section: Pr Equation Of State Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, even if these contributions could be included in the model in an explicit way, we did not do that because the purpose of this work was focused on the capability of this equation of state in its original form to represent the experimentally observed complex phase behavior developed by this mixture and compare its performance against another thermodynamic model. In this context, it should be mentioned that all phase equilibrium predictions with this equation were obtained using binary interaction parameters taken from the literature, which had previously been fitted from binary vapor-liquid equilibrium data, instead of using other interaction parameters fitted from three phase equilibrium data, as done, for instance, by Nutakki [31] to modeling the three-phase binary water-hydrocarbon systems data of Brady et al [32] and Tsonopoulos and Wilson [33] with the Schmidt-Wenzel EoS in order to determine the interaction parameters between the hydrocarbon and water in the hydrocarbon liquid and aqueous phases. The latter is important because once the interaction parameters have been fitted at three phase equilibrium conditions, there is a risk to use them to predict the phase behavior of a given system at different conditions at which the interaction parameters were determined, so that the prediction may fail and/or give physical meaningless results.…”
Section: Pr Equation Of State Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lewan (1992) suggests that the enhancement of yield under hydrous conditions relative to anhydrous closed conditions is a result of dissolved H20 in the bitumen network acting as a source of hydrogen. It has been experimentally established that the solubility of water in hydrocarbons is two orders of magnitude higher than the solubility of hydrocarbons in water (Tsonopoulos and Wilson, 1983;Heidman and others, 1985;Skripka and Boksha, 1976;Guerrant, 1964;Griswold and Kasch, 1942). However, this high solubility of water in hydrocarbons is strongly dependent on temperature, with water solubilities being more than one order of magnitude higher at temperatures used in hydrous pyrolysis (300°C to 365°C) than at temperatures encountered in subsiding sedimentary basins ( 1 00°C to 200°C).…”
Section: Logarithm Of Heating Rate In Degrees Celsius Per Hourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models can also be used to compare the new experimental data with literature values obtained at other conditions, and can reveal data quality issues related to composition or temperature dependence that, otherwise, would remain undetected (see [56]). Nonetheless, successful application of these consistency tests should be considered necessary, but not sufficient, tests of data quality.…”
Section: Data Validation and Model Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%