High-Temperature Properties of Stainless Steel for Building Structures

Sakumoto, Y.; Nakazato, Takahiro; Matsuzaki, Akiyoshi

doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1996)122:4(399)

Cited by 45 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The material chosen was ASTM 304 stainless steel. Figure 14 compares the present elastic modulus measurements with the measurements of Sakumoto et al [15]. Good agreement can be observed at both room temperature and 400°C.…”

Section: Validationsupporting

confidence: 78%

Measurement of Elastic Modulus of PUNB Bonded Sand as a Function of Temperature

Thole

Beckermann

2010

Inter Metalcast

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Validationsupporting

confidence: 78%

Measurement of Elastic Modulus of PUNB Bonded Sand as a Function of Temperature

Thole

Beckermann

2010

Inter Metalcast

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…An additional objective was to extend the range of grades covered by current structural design guidance, while also rationalising the number of strength reduction factors provided to designers by grouping grades that exhibit similar characteristics. and Ala-Outinen and Oksanen [3], together with those presented by Sakumoto [20], allow a direct comparison between the results obtained for stainless steel from these two testing techniques. With reference to the 0.2% proof strength, the authors of both of the above studies indeed observed lower reduction factors from anisothermal tests, but at higher strains, the differences were small.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 94%

“…The cold-formed material was extracted from cold-rolled structural hollow sections, and would therefore have undergone some degree of cold-work during production [19]. Sakumoto et al [20] [32]. It should be emphasised that cold-worked stainless steel sheet material is supplied to specified minimum standard values, whereas during cold-forming of sections, an unspecified level of cold-work is experienced, depending primarily on the forming route and section geometry.…”

Section: Materials Tests At Elevated Temperatures For Stainless Steelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Elevated temperature material properties of stainless steel alloys

Gardner

Insausti

Ng³

et al. 2010

Journal of Constructional Steel Research

229

119

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Appropriate assessment of the fire resistance of structures depends largely on the ability to accurately predict the material response at elevated temperature. The material characteristics of stainless steel differ from those of carbon steel due to the high alloy content. These differences have been explored in some detail at room temperature, whilst those at elevated temperatures have been less closely scrutinised. This paper presents an overview and reappraisal of previous pertinent research, together with an evaluation of existing elevated temperature stainless steel stress-strain test data and previously proposed material models. On the basis of examination of all available test data, much of which have been recently generated, revised strength and stiffness reduction factors at elevated temperatures for a range of grades of stainless steel have been proposed, including four grades not previously covered by existing structural fire design guidance. A total of eight sets of strength reduction factors are currently provided for different grades of stainless steel in EN 1993-1-2 and the Euro Inox/ SCI Design Manual for Structural Stainless Steel, compared to a single set for carbon steel. A number of sets of reduction factors is appropriate for stainless steel since the elevated temperature properties can vary markedly between different grades, but this has to be justified with sufficient test data and balanced against ease of design -it has been proposed herein that the eight sets of reduction factors be rationalised on the basis of Gardner, L., Insausti, A., Ng, K. T. and Ashraf, M. (2010) . Elevated temperature material properties of stainless steel alloys. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 66(5), 634-647.

show abstract

“…In addition, the macroscopicmodulus obtainedbyaresonance technique is shown for comparison. [28] Resonance techniques are expected to give as lightly lower modulus than that obtained from (effectively) static loading, sincethe former is an adiabatic measure of stiffnessw hile the latter is isothermal ( e.g. , Reference 29).…”

Section: Elastic Deformationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Elastoplastic deformation of 316 stainless steel under tensile loading at elevated temperatures

Daymond

Bouchard

2006

Metall Mater Trans A

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The response of 316 stainless steel has been examined under uniaxial tensile loading during ar ange of tests carriedo ut between 20°Ca nd 650°C. In-situ neutron diffraction was used to measure internal elastic strain in subsets of differently oriented crystallites within the polycrystal aggregate. This allowed the determination of diffraction elastic constants. Further,r esults have been compared with predictions from as lip-based elasto-plastic self-consistent model. Good agreement is obtained during both conventional slip and whend ynamic straina ging (DSA) is evidenced. The quality of agreement was reduced in the higher temperature regime, where it is expected that other mechanisms become active.

show abstract

High-Temperature Properties of Stainless Steel for Building Structures

Cited by 45 publications

References 3 publications

Measurement of Elastic Modulus of PUNB Bonded Sand as a Function of Temperature

Measurement of Elastic Modulus of PUNB Bonded Sand as a Function of Temperature

Elevated temperature material properties of stainless steel alloys

Elastoplastic deformation of 316 stainless steel under tensile loading at elevated temperatures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About