2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.05.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High temperature pyrolysis of sewage sludge as a sustainable process for energy recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be remembered that an initial sCOD amount of 61 mg/gVS was also measured in the greenhouse crop waste. Based on the ratio of 0.35 LCH 4 /gCOD, now universally recognized as the relationship between sludge COD utilized and methane generated [ 34 ], the utilization of the available sCOD would only correspond to 21 mLCH 4 /gVS. The generation of the remaining 153 mLCH 4 /gVS has to be related to the hydrolysis of the particulate organics, requiring 0.437 g of particulate COD/gVS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be remembered that an initial sCOD amount of 61 mg/gVS was also measured in the greenhouse crop waste. Based on the ratio of 0.35 LCH 4 /gCOD, now universally recognized as the relationship between sludge COD utilized and methane generated [ 34 ], the utilization of the available sCOD would only correspond to 21 mLCH 4 /gVS. The generation of the remaining 153 mLCH 4 /gVS has to be related to the hydrolysis of the particulate organics, requiring 0.437 g of particulate COD/gVS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a novel energy recovery perspective from wastewater should answer three main questions: Do we still require (i) high sludge ages; (ii) low excess sludge generation, and (iii) traditional anaerobic sludge digestion for biogas energy? Recent studies have revealed that novel thermochemical processes such as high‐rate pyrolysis were much more effective than anaerobic digestion, replacing biogas by syngas …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially in traditional systems, the major concern was always the characteristics of treated sewage; sludge disposal had always a secondary prominence, while the system design at high SRT values implicitly involved minimization of sludge generation. Later, minimization of sludge quantity was accepted as an integral part of sustainable sludge management, mainly because (i) increasing cost of final disposal, accounting for a major component of the total cost of wastewater treatment; (ii) stringent limitations imposed on low technology disposal and reuse practice, such as landfilling and reuse in agriculture due to potential health risks …”
Section: Key Drawbacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it would be much more feasible to contemplate an energy effective alternative to sludge digestion. Anaerobic digestion should be considered as the weakest link of the conventional treatment scheme towards energy neutrality, which requires a novel energy effective alternative for this purpose, such as high rate pyrolysis, gasification, etc., rather than changing the entire treatment configuration …”
Section: Reshaping the Processmentioning
confidence: 99%