1972
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.28.1196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Temperature Superconductivity in Bridge and Layer Compounds

Abstract: compounds, where A is a monovalent atom or radical, T is an even-valence transition metal, C is a chalcogenide, and the parameters x and y lie in the ranges 0.1<#<,0.3, O^y < 0.5. The model explains why the maximum superconducting transition temperature T s m&x is higher than 12°K in bridge compounds withy =0.1, although the maximum value of T s observed in related layer compounds with y =0.0 is about 6°K.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

1973
1973
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first five conduction bands are predomi- Reference [7]. The next (s-like) conduction band lies several volts higher, contrary to some earlier models proposed [ 6 ] , and has mixed metal-ligand character. These results are quite comparable with the TiSs MO levels discussed previously, the noticeable differences being…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…The first five conduction bands are predomi- Reference [7]. The next (s-like) conduction band lies several volts higher, contrary to some earlier models proposed [ 6 ] , and has mixed metal-ligand character. These results are quite comparable with the TiSs MO levels discussed previously, the noticeable differences being…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…However, anion vacancies are known to be abundant in transition metal dichalcogenide materials, which may serve as the donor defects too. Other defects such as a Ti Frenkel pair (Ti F ), sometimes called a displacement Ti defect, have also been considered as the cause for the self-doping. TiS 2 has been experimentally shown to exhibit a complex relation between conductivity and temperature, , which is directly related to the defect physics of this material. So far, there has been no direct identification of the dominant defects in TiS 2 other than the nonstoichiometry arguments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%