2014
DOI: 10.1111/jph.12345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High‐Throughput Assessment and Genetic Investigation of Vegetative Compatibility in Verticillium dahliae

Abstract: Classification of isolates into vegetative compatibility groups (VCGs) using nitrate‐non‐utilizing (nit) mutants has been widely used for the characterization of Verticillium dahliae populations. However, certain methodological limitations prevent its application on a large scale. Furthermore, systematic investigations into the genetics underlying complementation tests between nit mutants of fungal isolates (i.e. heterokaryon formation) are lacking for Verticillium species. In this work, a diverse collection o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Mutants of the Δhex1 strain were compatible with each other and gave rise to robust heterokaryons, suggesting that hex1 is not required for hyphal fusion. Mutants of both the wild-type isolate Ls.17 and its Δhex1 descendant exhibited strong reactions with members of the same compatibility group, as expected, and also weaker or inconsistent interactions with members of other groups, which is often observed in this species [40]. No difference in the compatibility profile of the Δhex1 mutant was recorded, suggesting that the gene is not involved in the genetic control of heterokaryon incompatibility.…”
Section: Vdhex1 Is Not Involved In Heterokaryon Incompatibilitysupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Mutants of the Δhex1 strain were compatible with each other and gave rise to robust heterokaryons, suggesting that hex1 is not required for hyphal fusion. Mutants of both the wild-type isolate Ls.17 and its Δhex1 descendant exhibited strong reactions with members of the same compatibility group, as expected, and also weaker or inconsistent interactions with members of other groups, which is often observed in this species [40]. No difference in the compatibility profile of the Δhex1 mutant was recorded, suggesting that the gene is not involved in the genetic control of heterokaryon incompatibility.…”
Section: Vdhex1 Is Not Involved In Heterokaryon Incompatibilitysupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The Dutch testers of two main vegetative compatibility groups in V. dahliae did not make heterokaryons with themselves, as did American testers of these groups. This result confirms the conclusions of Papaioannou and Typas (2015) about the absence of strict genetic barriers between VCGs in V. dahliae. According to the authors a spectrum between highly stable and more unstable heterokaryosis exists in V. dahliae.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Later researchers refined Puhalla’s techniques and identified four main nit phenotypes, which are referred to as nit 1, nit 2, nit 3, and nit M [ 51 , 52 ]. The most commonly reported phenotypes recovered are nit 1 and nit M [ 53 55 ], and pairing of these is used to visualize complementation and heterokaryon formation for a variety of applications. Due to its simplicity, the use of the nit mutant system has become a standard test for grouping fungal isolates into vegetative compatibility groups (VCGs), which consist of all strains of a fungal species that are capable of undergoing vegetative fusion and stable heterokaryon formation with each other [ 46 ].…”
Section: Vegetative Compatibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a high-throughput method for obtaining nit mutants and performing complementation tests has been developed and tested [ 55 ]. This method speeds the generation of nit mutants by exposing them to ultraviolet radiation on chlorate-containing media.…”
Section: Vegetative Compatibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation