2010
DOI: 10.1109/tc.2010.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Throughput Disk Scheduling with Fair Bandwidth Distribution

Abstract: Abstract-Mainstream applications-such as file copy/transfer, Web, DBMS, or video streaming-typically issue synchronous disk requests. As shown in this paper, this fact may cause workconserving schedulers to fail both to enforce guarantees and to provide a high disk throughput. A high throughput can be however recovered by just idling the disk for a short time interval after the completion of each request. In contrast, guarantees may still be violated by existing timestamp-based schedulers, because of the rules… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Budget Fair Queuing (BFQ [52]) algorithm is a timestampbased proportional-share disk scheduler designed to provide strong guarantees on disk bandwidth distribution even in presence of synchronous workloads. Bandwidth distribution guarantees can be turned into soft timeliness guarantees, based on the mere knowledge of the aggregate throughput in the context of some workload scenario.…”
Section: Disk Bandwidth Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Budget Fair Queuing (BFQ [52]) algorithm is a timestampbased proportional-share disk scheduler designed to provide strong guarantees on disk bandwidth distribution even in presence of synchronous workloads. Bandwidth distribution guarantees can be turned into soft timeliness guarantees, based on the mere knowledge of the aggregate throughput in the context of some workload scenario.…”
Section: Disk Bandwidth Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interested reader can find an overview of traditional elevator algorithms in [49], while BFQ is detailed in [52].…”
Section: Disk Bandwidth Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The accessing will be done based on the queue data structure. Preemption process is activated inside the system in order to maintain the CFQ [1] concept, each request will get a fair allotment. The problem present in CFQ is that the arrival of a synchronous request may be arbitrarily delayed by a scheduler by just delaying the dispatching of the preceding request.…”
Section: Introduction Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only because of higher time stamp the request have to wait in the request queue for long time period. Instead of setting the time slot a new concept of bandwidth is introduced in the BFQ [1,2]. But here also the allotment of slot it kept as static it means once the budget is fixed it will remain the same for the entire operation.…”
Section: Introduction Imentioning
confidence: 99%