2010
DOI: 10.1177/1403494810377681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-throughput epidemiology: Combining existing data from the Nordic countries in health-related collaborative research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This enables studies of rare exposure and several outcomes. A large sample size also facilitates finding significant results earlier than in an RCT (161).…”
Section: Strengths Of Register Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This enables studies of rare exposure and several outcomes. A large sample size also facilitates finding significant results earlier than in an RCT (161).…”
Section: Strengths Of Register Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An explanation for the geographically skewed distribution could be the well-developed premises for public health research in the Nordic countries, such as the investment in welfare policies and public services 28 as well as the unique opportunities of using national registers in epidemiological research. 29 It has also been argued that this geographical pattern is not as evident when looking at specific public health research domains. 15 For example, the findings from the SPHERE project pointed out that environmental health and infectious disease research are more frequently published in eastern Europe, while social science research is more frequently conducted in northern and western European countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in recent years it has been approved as a kind of research that can be done safely and with a low risk of revealing individual information. It is a type of research where the ethical implications of doing no research by far outweigh the concerns of doing research (Olsen, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%