2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-throughput investigation of osteoblast response to polymer crystallinity: influence of nanometer-scale roughness on proliferation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
249
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 295 publications
(261 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
10
249
2
Order By: Relevance
“…At relatively high roughness (submicrometer down to ~100 nm), it is clear that substrate topography influences cell response, the cells responding to roughness by a higher cell thickness and a delayed apparition of the focal contacts [5,35] . At the nanometer scale, Washburn et al [36] showed that the rate of proliferation on the smooth regions of a poly(Llactic acid) film (below 1 nm) is much greater than on the rough regions (around 12 nm). The observed variations in proliferation were however weak in the 3-7nm range.…”
Section: Relative Importance Of Film Stiffness Roughness and Wettabimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At relatively high roughness (submicrometer down to ~100 nm), it is clear that substrate topography influences cell response, the cells responding to roughness by a higher cell thickness and a delayed apparition of the focal contacts [5,35] . At the nanometer scale, Washburn et al [36] showed that the rate of proliferation on the smooth regions of a poly(Llactic acid) film (below 1 nm) is much greater than on the rough regions (around 12 nm). The observed variations in proliferation were however weak in the 3-7nm range.…”
Section: Relative Importance Of Film Stiffness Roughness and Wettabimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Washburn et al 101 used a temperature gradient to induce varying crystallinity and thus a roughness gradient on the nanometre length-scale. They created a thin film of poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA) on a silanised silicon wafer, which was annealed on a temperature gradient ranging from 44 to 100 C. The RMS values achieved with this method ranged from 0.54 to 13 nm.…”
Section: 24mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas proliferation increased towards a higher surface roughness on the micrometre scale, 117 the opposite behaviour was found for nanofeature gradients. 101,118 In order to adhere to surfaces, cells need to form focal contacts. The spacing between particles is in the nanometre range, meaning much smaller than the size of the cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the cellular response in different surfaces is largely researched, the studies are limited by the use of the terms "smooth or rough", that is, surfaces with roughness values that little varies among them. Additionally, the substrates are produced by different techniques, creating different types of surfaces [28].…”
Section: Seven Daysmentioning
confidence: 99%