2021
DOI: 10.1002/agj2.20632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High‐throughput phenotyping of canopy height in cool‐season crops using sensing techniques

Abstract: Plant breeders are interested in plant height data, which is an important agronomic data associated with lodging and mechanical harvest. Manual measurement of plant height with limited samples per plot and data acquisition frequency remains the standard method in breeding programs. To overcome such limitations, this study focuses on plant height estimation in canola (Brassica napus L./winter canola, and B. napus L. and B. rapa L./spring canola), pea (Pisum sativum L.), chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), and cameli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the ease of UAS image acquisition and mapping common CT QTL with UAS and manual phenotyping, improved scalability with UAS phenomics could lead to strong QTL-to-marker associations in applied breeding programs for developing climate-resilient crops (Varshney et al, 2021). Application of UAS phenomics was limited to upstream genetic studies for high heritability traits, such as plant height, lodging, and disease resistance (Wang et al, 2018; Singh et al, 2019; Sarkar et al, 2020; Zhou et al, 2020; Zhang et al, 2021). Our study directly demonstrates the utility of UAS phenomics for prebreeding of complex traits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the ease of UAS image acquisition and mapping common CT QTL with UAS and manual phenotyping, improved scalability with UAS phenomics could lead to strong QTL-to-marker associations in applied breeding programs for developing climate-resilient crops (Varshney et al, 2021). Application of UAS phenomics was limited to upstream genetic studies for high heritability traits, such as plant height, lodging, and disease resistance (Wang et al, 2018; Singh et al, 2019; Sarkar et al, 2020; Zhou et al, 2020; Zhang et al, 2021). Our study directly demonstrates the utility of UAS phenomics for prebreeding of complex traits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study focused on measuring tree height and canopy crown volume using 2D images and 3D point cloud. The 2D canopy height model utilizing DTM from Pix4D (directly acquired from the software (technique 1, referred to as T1) and DTM (technique 2, referred to as T2) using point sampling from DSM (similar to that reported in [28]) for the individual sensor angle and integrated angle images were generated and used for measuring the tree height and canopy crown volume (Figure 2). In addition, UAV-based point cloud data and LiDAR point cloud data were also used to extract similar features.…”
Section: Extraction Of Architectural Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the active LiDAR sensing technologies, passive sensing-based methods (e.g., Multi-view images) can also measure 3D structure through methods like structure from motion (SFM) [ 3 , 18 , 45 , 69 ]. Among the passive sensing-based techniques, digital aerial photogrammetry (DAP) is one of the most popular ways for field CH estimation due to its low cost, high efficiency, and high accuracy comparable to ULS [ 17 , 21 , 75 , 76 ]. These 3D sensing techniques have been successfully applied to CH measurement, including the adoption of TLS for accurate height measurement of maize (R 2 = 0.93) [ 64 ], cotton (R 2 = 0.97) [ 60 ], rice (R 2 = 0.91) [ 63 ], barley (R 2 = 0.95), pea (R 2 = 0.93), and bean (R 2 = 0.91) [ 9 ], the use of BLS for efficient height measurement of large-scale wheat [ 78 ] and forest [ 22 , 32 , 58 ]; the exploration of ULS for estimating CH of sugar beet (R 2 = 0.70), wheat (R 2 = 0.78), and potato (R 2 = 0.50) [ 24 ], and DAP for measuring corn CH (R 2 = 0.78) [ 57 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%