2017
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Throughput Phenotyping of Sorghum Plant Height Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and Its Application to Genomic Prediction Modeling

Abstract: Genomics-assisted breeding methods have been rapidly developed with novel technologies such as next-generation sequencing, genomic selection and genome-wide association study. However, phenotyping is still time consuming and is a serious bottleneck in genomics-assisted breeding. In this study, we established a high-throughput phenotyping system for sorghum plant height and its response to nitrogen availability; this system relies on the use of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote sensing with either an RGB or … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
159
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
159
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a previous investigation used a similar image-based UAV technology to calculate cotton height [43], no field validation was performed, so this methodology remained non-validated at the early growth stage. In this context, some authors have estimated plant height at a late stage, such as Watanabe et al [44], in barley fields just before harvest, and Varela et al [45], some weeks before maize flowering, obtaining lower or similar R 2 values than our results: 0.52 and 0.63, respectively. Comparatively, the coefficient of correlation increased when the experiment was conducted at later stage, e.g., Varela et al [45] achieved an R 2 of 0.79 in the abovementioned experiment, but used images taken at flowering stage, which denotes a positive relationship between both variables.…”
Section: Obia-based Crop Height Estimationssupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Although a previous investigation used a similar image-based UAV technology to calculate cotton height [43], no field validation was performed, so this methodology remained non-validated at the early growth stage. In this context, some authors have estimated plant height at a late stage, such as Watanabe et al [44], in barley fields just before harvest, and Varela et al [45], some weeks before maize flowering, obtaining lower or similar R 2 values than our results: 0.52 and 0.63, respectively. Comparatively, the coefficient of correlation increased when the experiment was conducted at later stage, e.g., Varela et al [45] achieved an R 2 of 0.79 in the abovementioned experiment, but used images taken at flowering stage, which denotes a positive relationship between both variables.…”
Section: Obia-based Crop Height Estimationssupporting
confidence: 50%
“…However, there are only six articles that explicitly include “Phenotyping” or “Phenomics” in the titles and keyword (Zaman-Allah et al, 2015; Gomez-Candon et al, 2016; Haghighattalab et al, 2016; Holman et al, 2016; Shi et al, 2016; Watanabe et al, 2017). The other literatures are closely related to crop phenotyping using UAV-RSPs but do not explicitly mention crop phenotype; the research focuses on one or more crop traits.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, these platforms are utilized for the assessment of nurseries and breeder plots [9]. The plot-wise characteristics that are usually targeted for capture are canopy vigour [10,11], canopy height [12], biomass [13], leaf area [14] or ground cover [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of plant height using a ruler has long been the traditional approach [12,16,17]. Assessment of plant height from images is a far more complex process as it necessitates the estimation of depth in physical units; in discipline terms, a so-called depth map is reconstructed from multiple images of a canopy taken from slightly different viewpoints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%