2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-throughput quantification of eighteen heterocyclic aromatic amines in roasted and pan-fried meat on the basis of high performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole-orbitrap high resolution mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After optimizing the conditions of chromatog-raphy and mass spectrometry, the extracted ion chromatograms and MS/MS spectra of the three BPs (200 μg/L) were shown in Figures 3B and 3C, respectively. Moreover, in order to verify the analytical performance of the developed method, some characteristic parameters, including linearity (linear range, correlation coefficients), LODs, LOQs, accuracy (recovery), precision (n = 6), and enrichment factor (EF) were investigated according to previous literature [21][22][23][24]. A series of mixed standard solutions (mass concentration: 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200 μg/L) were prepared using initial mobile phase (MeOH/0.05% ammonia, 40/60%).…”
Section: Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After optimizing the conditions of chromatog-raphy and mass spectrometry, the extracted ion chromatograms and MS/MS spectra of the three BPs (200 μg/L) were shown in Figures 3B and 3C, respectively. Moreover, in order to verify the analytical performance of the developed method, some characteristic parameters, including linearity (linear range, correlation coefficients), LODs, LOQs, accuracy (recovery), precision (n = 6), and enrichment factor (EF) were investigated according to previous literature [21][22][23][24]. A series of mixed standard solutions (mass concentration: 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200 μg/L) were prepared using initial mobile phase (MeOH/0.05% ammonia, 40/60%).…”
Section: Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the MEs, two modified SPs stock solutions were diluted to five levels with or without 10 μg/L modified SIL peptides by the tryptic hydrolysates of rice and food product. MEs were calculated from the ratio of the slope of matrix‐matched standard curves and solvent‐based standards using the following formula: matrix effects (%) = (B/A − 1) × 100 (Chen et al, 2019; Huang et al, 2020; Xu et al, 2021), where B is the slope of the matrix‐matched calibration curve and A is the slope from spiked pure solvent (80% ACN aqueous solution containing 0.1% FA). The MEs were considered significant signal suppression or enhancement caused by matrix interference when ratio values differed by >20% (Sun et al, 2019; Xu et al, 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 10-g sample was mixed with 20 mL of water and titrated with 0.1 M NaOH using phenolphthalein as an indicator ( 19 ). The control was under the same conditions without the sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%