2014
DOI: 10.1039/c3lc51202a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-throughput screening for industrial enzyme production hosts by droplet microfluidics

Abstract: A high-throughput method for single cell screening by microfluidic droplet sorting is applied to a whole-genome mutated yeast cell library yielding improved production hosts of secreted industrial enzymes. The sorting method is validated by enriching a yeast strain 14 times based on its α-amylase production, close to the theoretical maximum enrichment. Furthermore, a 10 5 member yeast cell library is screened yielding a clone with a more than 2-fold increase in α-amylase production. The increase in enzyme prod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
188
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
188
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By alternatively transforming microfluidic emulsions to double emulsions (12) or hydrogel beads equipped with polyelectrolyte shells (13), sorting in standard flow cytometers also becomes possible. However, to date, all ultrahigh-throughput screening campaigns implemented in microcompartmentalized formats (including microcapillary arrays) have so far relied on detection of a fluorescent product (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). When assays that lack this type of readout are to be used (e.g., involving instead the widely used absorbance detection), droplet screening is currently impossible: Colony screening assays (relying on precipitation of insoluble product and thus encumbered by poor dynamic range and assay quality) or microwell-plate screening with sophisticated robots (higher quality but expensive in terms of capital expenditure and running costs) remain the only options.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By alternatively transforming microfluidic emulsions to double emulsions (12) or hydrogel beads equipped with polyelectrolyte shells (13), sorting in standard flow cytometers also becomes possible. However, to date, all ultrahigh-throughput screening campaigns implemented in microcompartmentalized formats (including microcapillary arrays) have so far relied on detection of a fluorescent product (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). When assays that lack this type of readout are to be used (e.g., involving instead the widely used absorbance detection), droplet screening is currently impossible: Colony screening assays (relying on precipitation of insoluble product and thus encumbered by poor dynamic range and assay quality) or microwell-plate screening with sophisticated robots (higher quality but expensive in terms of capital expenditure and running costs) remain the only options.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interest in droplet microfluidics has emerged because droplets are perfectly suited as miniaturized reaction chambers for encapsulation and investigation of cells at the singlecell level (Schneider et al 2013;Shembekar et al 2016), and the technology allows for improved genome engineering and screening of cells (Agresti et al 2010;Sjostrom et al 2014). In most of these applications, having the possibility to precisely handle the particles inside the droplets expands the complexity of the assays that can be performed on-chip.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Droplet microfluidics has been used for a number of single cell or single molecule applications, for example, functional screening of hybridoma cells, 6 the study of sickling in red blood cells, 7 and the improvement of enzyme production in cells using directed evolution. 8 Droplet incubation can be divided into on-and off-chip approaches. Examples of on-chip methods are delay channels, used to incubate droplets for shorter periods of time 9 and serpentine channels, 10 droplet traps, 11 and dropspots 12 used for longer incubation times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of on-chip methods are delay channels, used to incubate droplets for shorter periods of time 9 and serpentine channels, 10 droplet traps, 11 and dropspots 12 used for longer incubation times. Off-chip methods are used for cell culture in droplets, e.g., by collecting the emulsion in syringes 8,13 or in a Pasteur pipette under a layer of media 14 and PDMS sealed vials for thermocycling. 15 None of these put droplets in direct contact with the surrounding atmosphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%