2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-throughput sequencing for 1-methyladenosine (m1A) mapping in RNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
36
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The levels of known tRNA methylations including m 1 A, m 7 G, m 5 C, and m 3 C, were measured with ALKBH1 treatment in the presence or absence of EDTA (EDTA chelates iron and inhibits the demethylation activity) using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS, Figure S1D) (Jia et al, 2011; Zheng et al, 2013). Incubation of total tRNA with ALKBH1 led to a dramatic decrease of the m 1 A level, but not levels of m 7 G, m 5 C, or m 3 C, in comparison to the control samples (Figure 1D and Figure S2A), suggesting that m 1 A58 in tRNAs is a major substrate of ALKBH1 (Figure 1E); m 1 A58 has been shown to be the predominant m 1 A modifications in tRNAs as revealed by recent m 1 A sequencing experiments (Cozen et al, 2015; Tserovski et al, 2016). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The levels of known tRNA methylations including m 1 A, m 7 G, m 5 C, and m 3 C, were measured with ALKBH1 treatment in the presence or absence of EDTA (EDTA chelates iron and inhibits the demethylation activity) using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS, Figure S1D) (Jia et al, 2011; Zheng et al, 2013). Incubation of total tRNA with ALKBH1 led to a dramatic decrease of the m 1 A level, but not levels of m 7 G, m 5 C, or m 3 C, in comparison to the control samples (Figure 1D and Figure S2A), suggesting that m 1 A58 in tRNAs is a major substrate of ALKBH1 (Figure 1E); m 1 A58 has been shown to be the predominant m 1 A modifications in tRNAs as revealed by recent m 1 A sequencing experiments (Cozen et al, 2015; Tserovski et al, 2016). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…m 1 A has been identified in toto in mRNA by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, whereas antibody-based pulldowns coupled with next-generation sequencing have been used to map m 1 A-containing sequences genome-wide (24,59). m 1 A modifies the WC face; thus, it can also be identified by its induction of a combined stop and mismatch profile in reverse transcription (112). Biological implications of structural signatures associated with ψ, m 6 A, and m 1 A are described below.…”
Section: Methods To Identify Natural Rna Modifications Genome-widementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, high-throughput techniques have been developed for the analysis of a small subset of RNA modifications, namely m 6 A, m 1 A, pseudouridine and m 5 C [58,59,60,61,62]. These techniques allow transcriptome-wide screening, but the quantification of modification is uncertain and, when possible, requires complex calibration procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%