Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
A heavy oil field (Field X) in Northern Kuwait is in the early stages of development but it is clear from production pilots that tight units (baffles) of variable lithology, thickness and continuity, within the reservoir will play a key role in influencing steam conformance and recovery efficiency. The high well/core density of the field’s production startup area allows re-evaluation of baffles in light of cross-discipline integration of pilot production data, petrophysical data and detailed core review. A process was followed to update and calibrate all core descriptions against logs, follow a consistently picked set of petrophysically defined markers, compare visually defined lithofacies with log defined ones, and then map out key surfaces. The key next step is to define appropriate reservoir properties by facies/rock types, apply these to understanding pilot behaviour and predict steam conformance for Well, Reservoir and Facilities Management (WRFM) and the next phases of the wider field development planning. The field’s baffles play a role far beyond just understanding steam conformance, they are a first barrier for cap rock integrity and their presence/absence will also influence the path and rate of the aquifer influx. The petrophysical redefinition (Baffle Quality Index) of a "semi-stratigraphic" interval - which will stop or slow steam migration depending on its quality and lateral extent - has enabled efficient communication about the baffle, and allowed the wider team of petroleum engineers from a number of subsurface disciplines to focus on dynamic properties impacting recovery – steam conformance, aquifer influx, windows between isolated reservoir units – and then evolve the development strategy, effectively respond to WRFM issues, optimize observation and infill well placement and increase UR in a cost effective way.
A heavy oil field (Field X) in Northern Kuwait is in the early stages of development but it is clear from production pilots that tight units (baffles) of variable lithology, thickness and continuity, within the reservoir will play a key role in influencing steam conformance and recovery efficiency. The high well/core density of the field’s production startup area allows re-evaluation of baffles in light of cross-discipline integration of pilot production data, petrophysical data and detailed core review. A process was followed to update and calibrate all core descriptions against logs, follow a consistently picked set of petrophysically defined markers, compare visually defined lithofacies with log defined ones, and then map out key surfaces. The key next step is to define appropriate reservoir properties by facies/rock types, apply these to understanding pilot behaviour and predict steam conformance for Well, Reservoir and Facilities Management (WRFM) and the next phases of the wider field development planning. The field’s baffles play a role far beyond just understanding steam conformance, they are a first barrier for cap rock integrity and their presence/absence will also influence the path and rate of the aquifer influx. The petrophysical redefinition (Baffle Quality Index) of a "semi-stratigraphic" interval - which will stop or slow steam migration depending on its quality and lateral extent - has enabled efficient communication about the baffle, and allowed the wider team of petroleum engineers from a number of subsurface disciplines to focus on dynamic properties impacting recovery – steam conformance, aquifer influx, windows between isolated reservoir units – and then evolve the development strategy, effectively respond to WRFM issues, optimize observation and infill well placement and increase UR in a cost effective way.
Within North Kuwait heavy oil fields, integrated reservoir modelling is challenged by inherent reservoir heterogeneities, regional non-stationarity (i.e. trends), asymmetrical well and seismic distributions, and the need to maintain alignment between various the model scales required and multiple purposes for which the models will be used. This paper presents a number of customized workflows adapted to characterize these reservoir architectures and heterogeneities within one field, appropriately at all model scales and in regions with variable well control. A reliable new rock type classification scheme was derived from cross plot analyses of Gamma Ray and Bulk Density (GR-DENS) logs. Within an initial production area containing over 900 regularly spaced wells, 3D variograms for these lithotypes were estimated, calibrated with 3D seismic and reservoir equivalent surface outcrops. The lithotypes were distributed into full field static models using these variograms and the Sequential Indicator Simulation (SIS) algorithm. An additional declustering step was implemented to express regional trends and account for asymmetrical data distribution. Petrophysical property modeling (shale volume, effective porosity, water saturation) was performed using the Kriging algorithm conditioned to lithofacies. From these full field models, sector models were created to capture geological heterogeneity at a smaller grid increment. Full-field facies were downscaled onto the sector model grids, and then the Sequential Gaussian Simulation (SGS) algorithm was used to interpolate petrophysical properties, constrained by histograms of the kriged background models. This allowed information from wells outside of sector models to be incorporated efficiently into them. The facies and heterogeneities represented within the full-field static models have improved upon earlier versions, by being distributed more consistently relative to known seismic and well control, and to outcrop reservoir analogues. Modelled petrophysical properties also show a more consistent linkage with known values derived from core analyses. This consistent set of models can now be used with greater confidence, to answer questions ranging from in-place volume uncertainties to dynamic production forecasting, to life of field development. This has also led to reduced dynamic model run times, and improved reservoir management and operations optimization. In summary a robust series of full-field and sector models was developed and customized to a North Kuwait heavy-oil field, with information from data-rich areas being elegantly applied to reduce uncertainties in data-poor areas. These nested models can now be matched to the detail required for the model purpose. For example heterogeneities that matter-for-flow in dynamic simulation models can be represented explicitly, whereas for full-field volume estimations property averages can be used.
A cyclic steam stimulation (CSS) laboratory experiment was conducted with dead heavy oil. Four cycles of steam injection and fluid production were performed, at reservoir pressure, in order to assist in the numerical modelling and understanding of the main mechanisms involved in the process. This was an important part to developing a base model for a broader project evaluating CSS steam-hybrid experiments with live oil. Experimental data, history matching approach and results, as well as key insights are presented. An experimental setup, originally designed to evaluate CSS hybrid processes, was improved by fitting a sight glass to identify the fluids flowing out of the opposite core end (into a ballast system), during injection cycles. Dead oil was used to facilitate the analysis of this experiment. Relative permeability curves were tuned to history match each cycle sequentially. Injection periods were matched before production ones in order to estimate the amounts of oil and water displaced to the ballast during injection (unknown although total liquid volumes in the ballast were continuously recorded), which were later injected back into the core during production periods. A one-dimensional grid successfully represented the core section while the ballast system was modelled with a production and an injection well. Experimental data such as temperature profiles, pressures and rates were honored. A volumetric ratio of 40% water and 60% oil appeared to be the typical composition of the fluid received by the ballast during injection periods based on simulation results. Fluids reinjected from the ballast back into the core were modelled as an emulsion (i.e., a water-oil mixture). Relative permeability curves were the same for injection and production periods within the same cycle, except for an increased critical water saturation during the last two production periods. One set of relative permeability curves was obtained for each of the four cycles, and are presented in this work. The need to have different curves per each cycle suggests a different flow mechanism was taking place during the CSS test. It appears that the injected steam, after condensing to water, partially emulsified with the heavy oil in the core. Although all the cycles of the CSS experiment were successfully matched using water-oil relative permeability curves, questions about their sufficiency to model heavy oil recovery with steam processes arise. New insights are discussed based on this work and available literature. A CSS experiment conducted on a recently commissioned CSS laboratory setup, that mimics the cyclic movement of reservoir fluids with a ballast system, was successfully history matched using a non-traditional approach. The fluids displaced out of the core-into the ballast-during steam injection were re-injected as a water-oil emulsion. New insights from this work underline the need to rethink the traditional way of modelling heavy oil recovery with steam, where emulsion formation typically occurs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.