1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02463036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher and lower-order cognitive skills: The case of chemistry

Abstract: A major driving force in the current effort to reform science education is the conviction that it is vital for our students to develop their higher-order cognitive skills capacity in order to function effectively in our modem, complex science and technology-based society. In line with this rationale, this study focuses on the use of examinations for studying student performance in chemistry examination on items that require higher-order cognitive skills (HOCS) or lower-order cognitive skills (LOCS). This usage… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
69
0
4

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
69
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…True inquiry ends with an elaboration and judgment that depends upon the previous reasoning processes." In accordance with the Benchmarks for Scientific Literacy (American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 1994) and the National Science Education Standards (National Research Council (NRC), 1996), authors like Zoller (1997) and Zohar and Dori (2003) include the following examples of higher-order thinking patterns in inquiryoriented science education: formulating a research question, planning experiments, controlling variables, drawing inferences, making and justifying arguments, identifying hidden assumptions, and identifying reliable sources of information. Swartz (2001) points out that during the late 1980s and throughout the 1990s, teachers in a wide variety of schools all over the United States, as well as in other countries, restructured the ways they teach common content to infuse instruction in diverse thinking skills.…”
Section: Teaching Higher-order Thinking In the Science Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…True inquiry ends with an elaboration and judgment that depends upon the previous reasoning processes." In accordance with the Benchmarks for Scientific Literacy (American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 1994) and the National Science Education Standards (National Research Council (NRC), 1996), authors like Zoller (1997) and Zohar and Dori (2003) include the following examples of higher-order thinking patterns in inquiryoriented science education: formulating a research question, planning experiments, controlling variables, drawing inferences, making and justifying arguments, identifying hidden assumptions, and identifying reliable sources of information. Swartz (2001) points out that during the late 1980s and throughout the 1990s, teachers in a wide variety of schools all over the United States, as well as in other countries, restructured the ways they teach common content to infuse instruction in diverse thinking skills.…”
Section: Teaching Higher-order Thinking In the Science Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is important to take into account the major impact of students' different backgrounds on the cognitive complexity of tasks (cf. Krathwohl, 2002;Zoller & Tsaparlis, 1997) when designing the future chemistry matriculation examinations.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…articles, charts, tables, pictures) in the questions when the examinations will more likely measure students' higher-order cognitive skills than rote memorisation of textbook content, or well-rehearsed routine skills (cf. Zoller & Tsaparlis, 1997). As well, it can be useful to sometimes add unnecessary diversions of input data to the questions when students have to really analyse the task to distinguish the essential content from all given information (cf.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As últimas edições do Exame foram marcadas por uma distribuição mais proporcional das demandas, fato que é salutar, pois em uma avaliação é necessário a presença de itens de altas e baixas demandas cognitivas, visando garantir uma distinção entre estudantes de baixa e alta proficiência. Exames compostos por somente itens com baixa demanda cognitiva não são eficazes para distinguir estudantes de alta proficiência dos de baixa proficiência (ZOLLER; TSAPARLIS, 1997).…”
Section: Dimensão Do Processo Cognitivounclassified