IntroductionAssessment lies at the heart of the chemistry education. As is well known, teachers teach and students study towards success in tests (e.g. Tamir, 2003). Thus, assessment points to what is considered relevant and ignores what is perceived to be unimportant (Doran, Lawrenz & Helgeson, 1994). Student assessment in chemistry education is often based on summative assessment. It's a predictive and comparable type of assessment that also gives an overview of students' previous learning obtained during an instructional unit (e.g. Black, 2004).In general, summative assessment is implemented at the end of an instructional unit to measure and document student achievement in proportion to other students' performances, or some predetermined instructional standards (e.g. Doran et al., 1994;McMillan, 2008). Various tests and examinations are typical summative assessment tools (McMillan, 2008). However, summative assessment may also include assessment of practical work (e.g. laboratory tasks), or different products (e.g. portfolios, research reports) (e.g. Miller, Linn & Gronlund, 2008).
Greta Tikkanen analysed Finnish chemistry matriculation examination questions in her