2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2110.15874
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher differentiability for a class of problems under p,q subquadratic growth

Abstract: We study the higher differentiability for nonlinear elliptic equation in divergence form A(x, Du) = b(x). The result covers the cases in which A(x, ξ) satisfies p, q growth, with 1 < p < 2 in ξ and a Sobolev dependence of with respect to x. By means of an a-priori estimate we ensure the W 2,p loc (Ω)-property for the solution of the boundary value problem.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to achieve the a priori estimate under the sharp integrability assumption on the independent term f , besides the use of the difference quotient method, we need to apply carefully the well known iteration Lemma on concentric balls to control the terms with critical integrability. We'd like to mention that previous higher differentiability result in the subquadratic non standard growth case has been recently obtained in [19] with independent term f ∈ L p p−1 . Especially, note that…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In order to achieve the a priori estimate under the sharp integrability assumption on the independent term f , besides the use of the difference quotient method, we need to apply carefully the well known iteration Lemma on concentric balls to control the terms with critical integrability. We'd like to mention that previous higher differentiability result in the subquadratic non standard growth case has been recently obtained in [19] with independent term f ∈ L p p−1 . Especially, note that…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…is valid. The choice of τ (see (33)), ∆ ℓ and estimate (32) combined with a straightforward induction argument yield (35). Indeed, assuming J ℓ−1 ≤ τ ℓ−1 J 0 , we obtain…”
Section: Proof Of Proposition 1 By Density Arguments We Are Allowed T...mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Currently, regularity theory for non-autonomous integrands with non-standard growth, e.g. p(x)-Laplacian or double phase functionals, are a very active field of research, see, e.g., the recent papers [4,9,12,18,16,17,19,20,21,23,28,27,30,35] and [2,11] for related results about the Lavrentiev phenomena.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%