2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2019.06.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher differentiability for solutions of nonhomogeneous elliptic obstacle problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many recent works deal with regularity properties of solutions to variational problems in which the integrand depends on the x−variable trough a function that is possibly discontinuous, such as in the case of Sobolev-type dependence, under quadratic (see [34]), and super-quadratic growth conditions (see [19,20,21,22,28,33]). This kind of topics has been object of study also in the framework of obstacle problems (see [8,10,11,32]), even in the case of (p, q)-growth condition (such as in [7,14,15]).…”
Section: ˆωmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many recent works deal with regularity properties of solutions to variational problems in which the integrand depends on the x−variable trough a function that is possibly discontinuous, such as in the case of Sobolev-type dependence, under quadratic (see [34]), and super-quadratic growth conditions (see [19,20,21,22,28,33]). This kind of topics has been object of study also in the framework of obstacle problems (see [8,10,11,32]), even in the case of (p, q)-growth condition (such as in [7,14,15]).…”
Section: ˆωmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, in [13] is proved the higher differentiability of the solution of an homogeneous obstacle problem with the energy density satisfying p-growth conditions; in [14] the integrand f depends also on the v variable; in [17] the energy density satisfies (p, q)-growth conditions. The nonhomogeneous obstacle problem is considered in [28] when the energy density satisfies p-growth conditions and in [7] when the energy density satisfies (p, q)-growth conditions. All previous quoted higher differentiability results have been obtained under a W 1,r with r ≤ n Sobolev assumption on the dependence on x of the operator A.…”
Section: ˆωmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case of non-standard growth conditions has been faced, for example, in [21,22], for what concerns (p, q)-growth and in case of variable exponents in [18]. The case of non-homogeneous obstacle problems is faced in [35], where the energy density satisfies p-growth conditions, and in [7], where the energy density satisfies (p, q)-growth conditions. All previously quoted higher differentiability results have been obtained assuming that, with respect to the x-variable, the map A belongs to a Sobolev space W 1,r with r ≥ n. However, taking into account the result obtained for unconstrained problem in [11,30], proving that if we deal with bounded solutions to, the higher differentiability holds true under weaker assumptions on the partial map x → A(x, ξ) with respect to W 1,n , and the result obtained in [7] proving that a local bound assumption on the obstacle ψ implies a local bound for the solutions to the obstacle problem (1.1), in [8,26] have been proven that, if the obstacle is locally bounded, higher differentiability results for the solutions of (1.1) persist assuming that the partial map x → A(x, ξ) belongs to a Sobolev class that is not related to the dimension n but to the growth exponent p of the functional in case of standard growth and to the ellipticity and the growth exponents p and q of the functional in case of non-standard growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%