“…The case of non-standard growth conditions has been faced, for example, in [21,22], for what concerns (p, q)-growth and in case of variable exponents in [18]. The case of non-homogeneous obstacle problems is faced in [35], where the energy density satisfies p-growth conditions, and in [7], where the energy density satisfies (p, q)-growth conditions. All previously quoted higher differentiability results have been obtained assuming that, with respect to the x-variable, the map A belongs to a Sobolev space W 1,r with r ≥ n. However, taking into account the result obtained for unconstrained problem in [11,30], proving that if we deal with bounded solutions to, the higher differentiability holds true under weaker assumptions on the partial map x → A(x, ξ) with respect to W 1,n , and the result obtained in [7] proving that a local bound assumption on the obstacle ψ implies a local bound for the solutions to the obstacle problem (1.1), in [8,26] have been proven that, if the obstacle is locally bounded, higher differentiability results for the solutions of (1.1) persist assuming that the partial map x → A(x, ξ) belongs to a Sobolev class that is not related to the dimension n but to the growth exponent p of the functional in case of standard growth and to the ellipticity and the growth exponents p and q of the functional in case of non-standard growth.…”