2013
DOI: 10.1112/jtopol/jtt024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher-dimensional Reidemeister torsion invariants for cusped hyperbolic 3-manifolds

Abstract: For an oriented finite volume hyperbolic 3-manifold M with a fixed spin structure η, we consider a sequence of invariants {T n (M ; η)}. Roughly speaking, T n (M ; η) is the Reidemeister torsion of M with respect to the representation given by the composition of the lift of the holonomy representation defined by η, and the n-dimensional, irreducible, complex representation of SL(2, C). In the present work, we focus on two aspects of this invariant: its asymptotic behaviour and its relationship with the complex… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3.10) and (3.17). For the one-loop part S (conj) 1 , its large N behavior can be derived using a mathematical theorem found in [45].…”
Section: Conjecture On the Large N Behavior Of Perturbative Invariantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3.10) and (3.17). For the one-loop part S (conj) 1 , its large N behavior can be derived using a mathematical theorem found in [45].…”
Section: Conjecture On the Large N Behavior Of Perturbative Invariantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a µ-component hyperbolic link L there are 2 µ possible lifts of the holonomy representation ρ 0 : G(L) → P SL(2, C) to an SL(2, C)representation. It is known that there is a canonical one-to-one correspondence between the set of lifts of the holonomy representation and the set of spin structures of the exterior of a link (see [17]). Among them we focus on the lift ρ 0 : G(L) → SL(2, C) such that the images of the meridians of L by ρ 0 are matrices in SL(2, C) with the trace two.…”
Section: A Generalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a hyperbolic knot K and its holonomy representation ρ hol : π 1 (E K ) → SL 2 (C), it was shown in [MFP14,God] that the growth order of log |T K, σ n •ρ hol | or log |∆ K, σ n •ρ hol (1)| is the same as n 2 and the leading coefficient converges to the hyperbolic volume of E K divided by 4π. The set of SL 2 (C)-representations of π 1 (E K ) can be regarded as a deformation space of hyperbolic structures of E K .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%