2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-014-9775-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher education governance and performance based funding as an ecology of games

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
62
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
62
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nguyen et al (2016) and Rungfamai (2016) consider Vietnamese and Thai HEIs, respectively, to study the adoption of strategies responding to contextual factors to improve quality, produce knowledge, enhance institutional competitiveness, attract local and international students, and increase income. Nisar (2015) and Yokoyama (2006) stress the changing views about the role of government funding for HEIs and the promulgation of policies to increase external funding. Hence, these authors analyze the US strategy of paying for performance (Nisar, 2015) and entrepreneurialism in Japanese and UK universities (Yokoyama, 2006).…”
Section: Higher Education Governance and Corporate Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nguyen et al (2016) and Rungfamai (2016) consider Vietnamese and Thai HEIs, respectively, to study the adoption of strategies responding to contextual factors to improve quality, produce knowledge, enhance institutional competitiveness, attract local and international students, and increase income. Nisar (2015) and Yokoyama (2006) stress the changing views about the role of government funding for HEIs and the promulgation of policies to increase external funding. Hence, these authors analyze the US strategy of paying for performance (Nisar, 2015) and entrepreneurialism in Japanese and UK universities (Yokoyama, 2006).…”
Section: Higher Education Governance and Corporate Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nisar (2015) and Yokoyama (2006) stress the changing views about the role of government funding for HEIs and the promulgation of policies to increase external funding. Hence, these authors analyze the US strategy of paying for performance (Nisar, 2015) and entrepreneurialism in Japanese and UK universities (Yokoyama, 2006). All of these studies establish a relationship between changes in context and governance practices at the institutional level.…”
Section: Higher Education Governance and Corporate Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance-based funding is derived from such a global idea which seeks performance instead of traditional indicators such as resource inputs, administrative processes, or fiscal audits. Basing budget allocations on institutional performance, such funding aims at motivating institutions to perform better, enhancing both institutional autonomy and accountability (Nisar, 2015;Shin, 2010). The tendency seems to in part related to a changing ideology and mindset of people as a result of the interplay between complex social influences.…”
Section: Resurgence Of Performance-based Fundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hicks (2012) contends that the rationale of performance funding is that more government funds should go to "performing" institutions than to less successful institutions to provide better performers with a competitive edge and to stimulate poorer performers to improve. As Nisar (2015) put it forthrightly, under the new accountability regime and the performance-based funding mechanism, higher education "is no longer considered a 'holy cow' which cannot be sacrificed and faces tough competition in terms of budgetary allocations from other sectors" (p. 293).…”
Section: Resurgence Of Performance-based Fundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation