2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:high.0000016461.98676.30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher education, internationalisation, and the nation-state: Recent developments and challenges to governance theory

Abstract: The new phenomenon of European integration has again challenged our conceptual and empirical tools for higher education studies to integrate the international dimension into frameworks that tend to concentrate on the single nation state and domestic policies even where international comparisons are made. It drives as well the awareness of certain blind spots: namely (1) the concentration on policy effects, neglecting the input side of policy formation, and (2) the concern with macro level policy-making and mes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
180
0
14

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 322 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
180
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…The two most-used approaches to defi ning internationalization, which also have a direct impact on international students, are the activity approach described as a series of activities, programs, and services ( Harari, 1977( Harari, , 1989Arum and Van de Water, 1992 ), research, scholarly, and international organization collaboration ( Beerkens and Derwende, 2007 ), export of knowledge and education ( Harman, 2002 ;Mazzarol and Soutar, 2002a ), and the process approach that involves policies ( Callan, 1998 ;Enders, 2004 ) and moves the higher educational institutions in an international direction ( Schoorman, 1999 ;Harman, 2005 ). Harari defi ned internationalization as " the international content of the curricula, the international movement of scholars and students concerned with training and research, and the arrangements that engage a system of education cooperation programs beyond its national boundaries " (1977, p. 2293), while Knight sees internationalization as " the process of integrating an international / intercultural dimension into the teaching, research and service functions of the institution " (1999, p. 16).…”
Section: Internationalization and Marketingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two most-used approaches to defi ning internationalization, which also have a direct impact on international students, are the activity approach described as a series of activities, programs, and services ( Harari, 1977( Harari, , 1989Arum and Van de Water, 1992 ), research, scholarly, and international organization collaboration ( Beerkens and Derwende, 2007 ), export of knowledge and education ( Harman, 2002 ;Mazzarol and Soutar, 2002a ), and the process approach that involves policies ( Callan, 1998 ;Enders, 2004 ) and moves the higher educational institutions in an international direction ( Schoorman, 1999 ;Harman, 2005 ). Harari defi ned internationalization as " the international content of the curricula, the international movement of scholars and students concerned with training and research, and the arrangements that engage a system of education cooperation programs beyond its national boundaries " (1977, p. 2293), while Knight sees internationalization as " the process of integrating an international / intercultural dimension into the teaching, research and service functions of the institution " (1999, p. 16).…”
Section: Internationalization and Marketingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These relationships have local, regional, national and international ingredients (e.g. Dill and Sporn 1995;Castells 1996;Clark 1998;Huisman et al 2001;Enders 2004;OECD 2007). Such interconnections and interdependencies relate to both the external functions of higher education, for example in terms of the economic and social functions it carries out, and the services in terms of teaching, research and knowledge transfer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shift from the elite higher education (HE) paradigm to mass HE (Daniel, 1993;Ramsden, 1998), internationalization and globalization (De Wit, 2011;Enders, 2004;Karim & Maarof, 2012;Rostan & Ceravolo, 2015;Shin & Harman, 2009;Van Damme, 2001), wide utilization of information technology (Scott, Tilbury, Sharp, & Deane, 2012;Stensaker, Maassen, Borgan, Oftebro, & Karseth, 2007), and the new fundraising approaches in HE (Keener, Carrier, & Meaders, 2002;Shin & Harman, 2009;Teixeira & Koryakina, 2013) deem to be a few of the main sources of the change forces for the newly emerged challenges. Not only the universities are facing challenges, but also they cause many changes in societies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%