2016
DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcw051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher Education Participation in the Nordic Countries 1985–2010—A Comparative Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
28
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense Scandinavian HE policies mirror the typical social democratic welfare orientation and the relative consensus about core questions related to the prominent role of public HE, an observation that finds general support in the literature (Ahola et al., ; Börjesson, Ahola, Helland & Thomsen, , Thomsen et al. ) and lends support to our second assumption indicating that a common set of values has shaped the welfare orientation of HE policies in the three countries. It should also be noted that an additional motivation for these policies has been economic, turning on the importance of investing in higher education and research in order to improve the competitive edge of post‐industrial economies on the international market place (Börjesson et al., ).…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivessupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In this sense Scandinavian HE policies mirror the typical social democratic welfare orientation and the relative consensus about core questions related to the prominent role of public HE, an observation that finds general support in the literature (Ahola et al., ; Börjesson, Ahola, Helland & Thomsen, , Thomsen et al. ) and lends support to our second assumption indicating that a common set of values has shaped the welfare orientation of HE policies in the three countries. It should also be noted that an additional motivation for these policies has been economic, turning on the importance of investing in higher education and research in order to improve the competitive edge of post‐industrial economies on the international market place (Börjesson et al., ).…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivessupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The cultural reproduction model points towards an explanation of why the children of physicians and lawyers chose careers in medicine and law and why the children of clergy select training in theology even though they all could earn more money by pursuing master’s in business administration and working in the business sector. The explanation for the significant reproductive tendency in these educational fields should be sought elsewhere than the reproduction of a one‐dimensional hierarchical understanding of status, as several previous studies do (e.g., Hällsten ; Thomsen et al ). Hierarchies of prestige, power and wealth are of course important explanations of the patterns, but educational choice is also about cultural factors like values and identity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The responses were categorized into two categories: 0 = no university degree education, 1 = university, university of applied sciences, or other higher education institution (i.e., university degree). Parents' higher education has shown to relate strongly to many important factors in Finland such as their children's future participation in higher education (Thomsen et al, 2017) and school choice (Kosunen et al, 2016).…”
Section: Background Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%