2021
DOI: 10.1108/ijem-04-2021-0120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher education student engagement in times of pandemic: the role of e-learning system usability and teacher behavior

Abstract: PurposeThis research examined the factors affecting several types of student engagement, namely agentic, behavioral, emotional and cognitive engagement. Specifically, it examined the effect of e-learning system usability on student engagement and explored teacher behavior's possible intervening impact on this relationship.Design/methodology/approachData were collected from 418 students studying at different specializations at Omani private academic institutions. This study employed a quantitative methodology a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These research results also confirm previous study findings that showed that perceived level of usability significantly correlates with learners’ engagement [ 24 ]. Learners who perceive the system as easy to use, will be more engaged and motivated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These research results also confirm previous study findings that showed that perceived level of usability significantly correlates with learners’ engagement [ 24 ]. Learners who perceive the system as easy to use, will be more engaged and motivated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Both academic and behavioural engagements were the least dominant. In this case, as pointed out earlier, a study by Dahleez et al (2021) that investigated the effects of MOODLE usability and teacher behavior on student engagement found both variables impacted students' agentic, behavioral, emotional and cognitive engagements positively. However, in the present study as is the case with the first cohort, the second cohort student engagement differed from the findings by Bond et al (2020) as cognitive engagement, and not behavioral engagement, was the dominant engagement dimension.…”
Section: Second Cohort Student Engagementsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…During the current period of the COVID-19 pandemic, there are already studies that have been conducted on student engagement in the HE sector. Examples of these studies are those by Chen., Kaczmarek, and Ohyama (2020); Dahleez et al (2021); Hewson and Chung (2021) and Reguera and Lopez (2021). For instance, the study by Chen et al (2020) investigated student engagement together with the learning outcomes and students' perceptions of an online course that incorporated quizzes, tasks and tests as a formative assessment.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Matching is especially important when working with new or poor students, as they are prone to frustration at this stage of their education. Dahleez et al (2021) proposes three benefits of identifying learning styles: academic, personal, and professional. Meanwhile Maxwell-Stuart & Huisman (2018) examined the effect of matching or mismatching learning and teaching styles on student achievement.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%