2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.05.2009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher Energy Megavoltage Photon and Split Beam Technique Minimize the Testicular Dose During Radiation Prophylaxis of Heterotopic Ossification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, a testicular shield is effective in shielding scatter from external (machine head) sources, it does little to prevent in-scatter into the testicular region from within the patient. Hence, in order to further minimize the gonadal dose while maximizing sufficient target volume coverage, we recommend that CTbased simulation, 3-D treatment planning, a SBT and ≥10 MV photon beams be utilized (28,(32)(33)(34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, a testicular shield is effective in shielding scatter from external (machine head) sources, it does little to prevent in-scatter into the testicular region from within the patient. Hence, in order to further minimize the gonadal dose while maximizing sufficient target volume coverage, we recommend that CTbased simulation, 3-D treatment planning, a SBT and ≥10 MV photon beams be utilized (28,(32)(33)(34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ipsilateral (IL) and contralateral (CL) ovaries (OV) were contoured separately and dose volume histograms (DVH) generated. Additional planning trials were created for each patient by utilizing a SBT medially and by using different photon energies (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18) to investigate the difference in ovary dose among these maneuvers. Results: The median Mean-dose delivered to ILOV was 59 cGy and the median Max-dose was 177 cGy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in control patients who received no prophylaxis, it was increased up to 58% (9,10). Using high energy photon beams and split-beam techniques (SBT) radiation to adjacent tissues can be minimized (11)(12)(13)(14)(15). Although the majority of patients at risk of HO are males, females are also susceptible to HO development.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%