2014
DOI: 10.4161/fly.29489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher frequency of intron loss from the promoter proximally paused genes ofDrosophila melanogaster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S9). Intron losses and smaller transcript sizes are reported to enable regulation of expression timing in Drosophila and mouse 69 , 70 . It is not clear whether ‘gene-only’ tr–d events (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S9). Intron losses and smaller transcript sizes are reported to enable regulation of expression timing in Drosophila and mouse 69 , 70 . It is not clear whether ‘gene-only’ tr–d events (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8B and S6). Intron losses and smaller transcript sizes are thought to enable rapid responses and regulation of expression timing in Drosophila and mouse [91,92] as well as in yeast [93]. It may also indicate variations in DNA methylation landscapes among duplicated paralogs, which facilitate intron losses [94].…”
Section: Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small populations are more likely to gain introns because deleterious introns can become fixed, whereas even slightly deleterious introns are more likely to be eliminated in larger populations due to the higher efficiency of selection (Lynch, , ; Omilian et al ., ). IL is more prevalent in fast‐growing unicellular species due to selection for small genome size and rapid gene expression (Jeffares et al ., ; Jiang et al ., ), whereas IG is tolerated in slow‐growing metazoans in stable environments. In such environments, different mating strategies have pleiotropic effects on IL/IG rates, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%