2020
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher Institutional Volume Reduces Mortality in Reoperative Proximal Thoracic Aortic Surgery

Abstract: Objective This study aims to determine the impact of institutional volume on mortality in reoperative proximal thoracic aortic surgery patients using national outcomes data. Methods The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried from 1998 to 2011 for patients with diagnoses of thoracic aneurysm and/or dissection who underwent open mediastinal repair. A total of 103,860 patients were identified. A total of 1,430 patients had prior cardiac surgery. Patients were further stratified into groups by instituti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of redo aortic surgery is increasing due to multiple reasons, including: new aortic dissection or aneurysm, progressive aneurysm formation in non-resected dissected aortic segments during initial surgery, pseudoaneurysm formation at suture lines, prosthetic valve endocarditis, graft infection and failure of bioprosthetic valve [ 1 , 2 ]. However, redo aortic arch surgery following previous cardiac or aortic surgery is associated with significant risk of operative mortality compared to primary procedure, ranging from 5 to 19% [ 3 ], which caused by numerous factors included sternal re-entry injury secondary to dense adhesion, extensive aortic arch surgery, emergency surgery, prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass duration, poor heart function, and patients with older age. Hence, appropriate surgical approaches are the keys to a successful surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of redo aortic surgery is increasing due to multiple reasons, including: new aortic dissection or aneurysm, progressive aneurysm formation in non-resected dissected aortic segments during initial surgery, pseudoaneurysm formation at suture lines, prosthetic valve endocarditis, graft infection and failure of bioprosthetic valve [ 1 , 2 ]. However, redo aortic arch surgery following previous cardiac or aortic surgery is associated with significant risk of operative mortality compared to primary procedure, ranging from 5 to 19% [ 3 ], which caused by numerous factors included sternal re-entry injury secondary to dense adhesion, extensive aortic arch surgery, emergency surgery, prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass duration, poor heart function, and patients with older age. Hence, appropriate surgical approaches are the keys to a successful surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even among experienced centers, reoperative aortic surgery has an associated mortality of greater than 10%, with permanent neurologic injury in over 5% of patients. 1,2 Particularly in the case of aneurysmal aortic disease the inherent challenges of a redo mediastinal dissection with significant adhesions can present a life-threatening bleeding risk during resternotomy. Injuries to mediastinal structures during the course of resternotomy, while rare, are associated with a mortality of 26%, 3 underscoring the importance of minimizing injury whenever possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA2 The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%