2005
DOI: 10.1142/s0219525905000403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher Order Cellular Automata

Abstract: We introduce a class of dynamical systems called Higher Order Cellular Automata (HOCA). These are based on ordinary CA, but have a hierarchical, or multi-level, structure and/or dynamics. We present a detailed formalism for HOCA and illustrate the concepts through four examples. Throughout the article we emphasize the principles and ideas behind the construction of HOCA, such that these easily can be applied to other types of dynamical systems. The article also presents new concepts and ideas for describing an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The system we analyzed is an example of a Higher Order Cellular Automata Baas and Helvik (2005), or even more general, a higher order network being that groups of agents can act together as an entity. This hierarchy is modeled by creating a new agent on the next higher level, as illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Beyond Three Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system we analyzed is an example of a Higher Order Cellular Automata Baas and Helvik (2005), or even more general, a higher order network being that groups of agents can act together as an entity. This hierarchy is modeled by creating a new agent on the next higher level, as illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Beyond Three Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous notion of hyperstructures the set X 0 represents the systems or agents ðS i Þ; X 0 the observables (Obs), B 0 the interactions (Int) and a specific choice of b 0 ðS 0 Þ 2 B 0 ðS 0 Þ represents the resultant ''bond'' system giving rise to the next level of objects-called R in previous papers, like S i , Obs, Int, see Baas (1994aBaas ( , b, 1995Baas ( , 1996aBaas ( , b, c, 1997Baas ( , 2004Baas ( , 2005. Now let us form the next level and define:…”
Section: Hyperstructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous notion of hyperstructures the set X 0 represents the systems or agents (S i ), X 0 the observables (Obs), B 0 the interactions (Int) and a specific choice of b 0 (S 0 ) [ B 0 (S 0 ) represents the resultant ''bond'' system giving rise to the next level of objects-called R in previous papers, like S i , Obs, Int, see Baas (1994aBaas ( , b, 1995Baas ( , 1996aBaas ( , b, c, 1997Baas et al 2004;Baas and Helvik 2005). Now let us form the next level and define:…”
Section: Hyperstructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%