2017
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2016.2535376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher Order Compensation for Inductive-Power-Transfer Converters With Constant-Voltage or Constant-Current Output Combating Transformer Parameter Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where k is the coupling coefficient of the coupler. Because of the low values taken by k in IPTSs, inequality (22) is verified unless the difference between the designed and actual values of the reactive elements gets very high. Improvement in the efficiency attained with the TSR method has been examined for the prototypal IPTS by taking as supply angular frequency the central solution of (18) whenever bifurcation is detected.…”
Section: Tsr Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where k is the coupling coefficient of the coupler. Because of the low values taken by k in IPTSs, inequality (22) is verified unless the difference between the designed and actual values of the reactive elements gets very high. Improvement in the efficiency attained with the TSR method has been examined for the prototypal IPTS by taking as supply angular frequency the central solution of (18) whenever bifurcation is detected.…”
Section: Tsr Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compensation networks composed of one or more reactive components and arranged according to several topologies have been proposed in the literature for the IPTSs [20][21][22]. The simplest compensation network uses a capacitor for each IPTS coil with either a series or parallel connection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the transconductance gain GCC (22) and the voltage gain GCV (28), the relationship between battery charging current, charging voltage, and source voltage of IPT system can be expressed as According to (24), the constant current output can make the secondary impedance pure resistance by the change of 位 3 . From Figure 8, when 位 3 equals 0.72 (marked as 位 3_R ), no matter what the values of 位 1 and 位 2 are, the input impedance is pure resistance, which means no reactive power in the IPT system.…”
Section: Parameters Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some have been used in aforementioned work, each has its own shortcomings. Since the LCC topology has three parameters design freedoms [24][25][26], it will be better to implement this by changing the components of the topology. This paper develops a new IPT charging method to meet various charging requirements, including five sections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High efficiency and steady power transfer is the first and uppermost objectives for all IPT power applications. There are many studies to solve these problems, such as novel compensation topologies and parameters optimization [7], [8], magnetic couplers design for larger coupling coefficient [9]- [11], control techniques for obtaining desired output characteristics [12] and so on. Among these fields, compensation topology is essential for its determination of resonant frequency, power factor, output characteristics to achieve higher system efficiency, power density, and reliability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%