21st AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference 2013
DOI: 10.2514/6.2013-2565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher-Order Finite Volume Solution Reconstruction on Highly Anisotropic Meshes

Abstract: Numerical experiments have demonstrated that the least-squares solution reconstruction suffers from poor accuracy and conditioning on highly anisotropic meshes. These issues are more severe for meshes with finite curvature that are often encountered in aerodynamic applications. This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of solution reconstruction procedure for second-and higher-order finite volume schemes on anisotropic triangular meshes. For this purpose, two families of anisotropic meshes are considered. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore at least K number of elements are required in the stencil, in order to have at least as many equations as unknowns. In practice, however this is not sufficient it is prevalent in most of the approaches [2,11,36,37,48,50,51] in the k-exact least squares framework tend to use more elements (ranging from M = 1.5K to M = 3K ) and thus equations, than the number of the unknowns. The more equations used, the more robust and computationally expensive the scheme becomes.…”
Section: Central Stencil Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore at least K number of elements are required in the stencil, in order to have at least as many equations as unknowns. In practice, however this is not sufficient it is prevalent in most of the approaches [2,11,36,37,48,50,51] in the k-exact least squares framework tend to use more elements (ranging from M = 1.5K to M = 3K ) and thus equations, than the number of the unknowns. The more equations used, the more robust and computationally expensive the scheme becomes.…”
Section: Central Stencil Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous results verify that the least-squares system becomes well-conditioned and the derivatives are reconstructed reasonably accurate on meshes without curvature even at high aspect ratio provided that the reconstruction is performed along the principal axes. 10 However, the simulation of high Reynolds number turbulent flows requires sufficiently accurate polynomial approximation on high aspect ratio meshes with finite curvature. Mavriplis showed that least-squares reconstruction suffers from poor accuracy for second-order cell-centered discretization on unstructured meshes.…”
Section: Iib Solution Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Our numerical experiment showed the same type of behavior for higher-order reconstruction on this class of meshes. 10 Instead, we construct a local curvilinear coordinate system at the reference point of each control volume. For this purpose, we define a mapping from the physical space into a tangential-normal coordinate system for cells with high curvature near the walls:…”
Section: Iib Solution Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Taylor polynomial (10), the reason we divide x − x g and y − y g by R g is to improve the condition number of matrix M (g). As in [19], we are scaling the columns of the matrix so that they have a similar order of magnitude, independent of the grid spacing. We find that it is not necessary to scale the rows of the matrix, by methods such as weighting stencil cells by distance, as is done in [24].…”
Section: Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifying a suitable collection of cells from the original block and its neighbors is therefore not trivial. In the fully unstructured and "mesh-free" computational-fluid-dynamics literature, one technique for reconstruction is least-squares interpolation [3,4,24,15,27,23,19,8], which does not presume any underlying spatial relationship between the values used in the interpolation. This is the approach we take here.…”
Section: Major Radiusmentioning
confidence: 99%