2011
DOI: 10.1167/11.10.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher order texture statistics impair contrast boundary segmentation

Abstract: Texture boundary segmentation is conventionally thought to be mediated by global differences in Fourier energy, i.e., low-order texture statistics. Here, we have examined the importance of higher order statistical structure of textures in a simple second-order segmentation task. We measured modulation depth thresholds for contrast boundaries imposed on texture samples extracted from natural scene photographs, using forced-choice judgments of boundary orientation (left vs. right oblique). We compared segmentati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible explanation for the improved performance of the L-CAE compared to the baseline linear decoder is that it more fully exploits phase structure that is characteristic of natural images [2], perhaps by incorporating priors on phase structure that are not captured by linear decoding. To test this possibility, we trained both linear and L-CAE decoders on phase-scrambled natural images.…”
Section: Phase Scrambled Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation for the improved performance of the L-CAE compared to the baseline linear decoder is that it more fully exploits phase structure that is characteristic of natural images [2], perhaps by incorporating priors on phase structure that are not captured by linear decoding. To test this possibility, we trained both linear and L-CAE decoders on phase-scrambled natural images.…”
Section: Phase Scrambled Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Textures were generated on a trial-by-trial basis and subjected to the same homogeneity constraints as described previously (Arsenault, Yoonessi, & Baker, 2011) to preclude spurious luminance or contrast boundaries caused by unevenly distributed micropattern placements. In the low-density condition, only about 12% of the generated textures passed this test; in Figure 1.…”
Section: Texturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arguably we should use natural texture photographs to begin this investigation to ensure inclusion of any potentially important higher order statistics (Arsenault, Yoonessi, & Baker, 2011). However in pilot tests using boundaries between pairs of natural textures, we observed examples of both improvements and impairments to segmentation thresholds after removing structure by randomizing the phase spectrum, depending on which individual textures were employed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the grayscale patches, we also considered the effects of removing luminance difference cues. However, it is a much harder problem to create luminance-removed patches as was done in previous studies on surface segmentation (Ing et al, 2010), since simply subtracting the mean luminance in each region of an image patch containing an occlusion often yields a high spatial frequency boundary artifact, which provides a strong edge cue (Arsenault et al, 2011). Therefore, we circumvented this problem by setting a 3-pixel thick region around the boundary to the mean luminance of the entire patch, in effect covering up the boundary.…”
Section: Experimental Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we investigate the question of what locally available cues are used by human subjects to detect occlusion boundaries in natural scenes. We approach this problem by developing a novel database of natural occlusion boundaries taken from a set of uncompressed calibrated images used in previous research (Arsenault, Yoonessi, & Baker, 2011;Kingdom, Field, & Olmos, 2007;Olmos & Kingdom, 2004). We demonstrate that our database exhibits strong intersubject agreement in the locations of the labeled occlusions, particularly when compared with edges derived from image segmentation databases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%