We analyzed the kinetics of nonphotochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence (qN) in spinach (Spinacia oleracea) leaves, chloroplasts, and purified light-harvesting complexes. The characteristic biphasic pattern of fluorescence quenching in dark-adapted leaves, which was removed by preillumination, was evidence of light activation of qN, a process correlated with the de-epoxidation state of the xanthophyll cycle carotenoids. Chloroplasts isolated from dark-adapted and light-activated leaves confirmed the nature of light activation: faster and greater quenching at a subsaturating transthylakoid pH gradient. The light-harvesting chlorophyll a/bbinding complexes of photosystem II were isolated from darkadapted and light-activated leaves. When isolated from lightactivated leaves, these complexes showed an increase in the rate of quenching in vitro compared with samples prepared from darkadapted leaves. In all cases, the quenching kinetics were fitted to a single component hyperbolic function. For leaves, chloroplasts, and light-harvesting complexes, the presence of zeaxanthin was associated with an increased rate constant for the induction of quenching. We discuss the significance of these observations in terms of the mechanism and control of qN.Under different physiological conditions the efficiency with which absorbed light energy is harvested by photosynthesis is altered by the operation of a regulatory mechanism that determines how much excitation energy is used and how much is dissipated as heat (Horton, 1987; Demmig-Adams and Adams, 1992;Horton and Ruban, 1992; Bjö rkman and Demmig-Adams, 1995; DemmigAdams et al., 1995). The function of this mechanism is to harmlessly dissipate excess energy when photosynthesis is light saturated, thereby protecting the pigments and proteins of the chloroplast membrane from photo damage. The extent of energy dissipation, measured by the quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence, has been found to correlate with the extent of de-epoxidation of the xanthophyll cycle carotenoids (Demmig-Adams, 1990).The kinetics of the formation and relaxation of quenching and the effects of inhibitors established the role of the energization of thylakoid by the ⌬pH, so this quenching was referred to as qE (Briantais et al., 1979). It is therefore widely accepted that these two factors control the induction of qE . Various reports suggest that qE occurs in LHCII Horton et al., 1996), where the xanthophyll cycle carotenoids are bound (Peter and Thornber, 1991; Bassi et al., 1993;Ruban et al., 1994b) and where proton-active sites involved in qE have been identified Pesaresi et al., 1997). It has been suggested that CP26 and CP29, two of the minor components of LHCII, have a major role in qE Bassi et al., 1993; Crofts and Yerkes, 1994;Walters et al., 1994;Pesaresi et al., 1997;Gilmore et al., 1996b).It is unclear how the xanthophyll cycle and qE are related. Some have suggested that the de-epoxidized pigments antheraxanthin and zeaxanthin directly quench excited chlorophyll singlet states (Demmi...