Testing Adhesive Joints 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9783527647026.ch4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher Rate and Impact Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 has been developed. It combines technological solutions from the test rig of Beevers & Ellis [19] and from Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SPHB) testing means [12]. As it is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Global Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 has been developed. It combines technological solutions from the test rig of Beevers & Ellis [19] and from Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SPHB) testing means [12]. As it is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Global Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…automobile crash, aircraft impact etc. Goglio in [11], da Silva et al in [12] and Sato in [8] provide excellent reviews of these experimental test methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, understanding the mechanical behaviour of these joints under dynamic and combined loadings appears to be a prerequisite to ensure user safety [1,2]. Nowadays, several tests methods dedicated to the study of adhesively bonded joints are available under dynamic conditions [3][4][5]. The most commonly used are Izod and Charpy pendulums [6][7][8][9], Hopkinson bar techniques [10][11][12][13], drop weight machines [1,[14][15][16] and servo hydraulic systems [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard test method for apparent shear strength of single-lap-joint adhesively bonded metal specimens by tension loading according to the ASTM D1002 [19] is very commonly used for the characterization of bond strength of adhesive joint under quasi-static loading. The single-lap joint (SLJ) geometry used for this test is also the most studied in dynamics [1,4,8,9,14,15,20] due to low production costs, its ease of implementation and its similarity with geometry of many practical application [2,3]. However, this type of test leads to three major difficulties if the aim is to develop a law of mechanical behaviour that can be implemented in a finite element code for simulation purposes: (1) Due to thin substrates, this test generates a complex mix of shear and normal stresses in the adhesive layer [2,3,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation