2012
DOI: 10.2118/0312-0044-jpt
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher Resolution Subsurface Imaging

Abstract: Editor's note: This is the fifth in a seriesof articles on the great challenges facing the oil and gas industry as outlined by the SPE Research and Development (R&D) Committee. The R&D challenges comprise broad upstream business needs: increasing recovery factors, in-situ molecular manipulation, carbon capture and sequestration, produced water management, higher resolution subsurface imaging of hydrocarbons, and the environment. The articles in this series examine each of these challenges in depth. White paper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The integration of many data sources is beneficial in enhancing imaging capabilities, with DAS data specifically proving valuable for subsurface imaging purposes. SMF has been shown to be effective in subsurface imaging but faces some limitations, such as interference signals in Rayleigh backscattered light [90], as well as existence of the noise floor [62]. These limitations are addressed by employing proper active DAS measurement sources, enhanced spatial resolution, and SNRs; the use of a deliberate cable deployment method; and selection of relevant acquisition parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integration of many data sources is beneficial in enhancing imaging capabilities, with DAS data specifically proving valuable for subsurface imaging purposes. SMF has been shown to be effective in subsurface imaging but faces some limitations, such as interference signals in Rayleigh backscattered light [90], as well as existence of the noise floor [62]. These limitations are addressed by employing proper active DAS measurement sources, enhanced spatial resolution, and SNRs; the use of a deliberate cable deployment method; and selection of relevant acquisition parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One commonly used EM instrument is ground‐penetrating radar (GPR), which is a high‐frequency (usually 50–200 MHz in most CZ systems) method used for mapping the CZ base in shallow (usually <10 m) systems (e.g., Guo, Ma, et al., 2020; Guo, Mount, et al., 2020; Orlando et al., 2016). A deeper option is controlled‐source electromagnetics (CSEM), which can map low‐resistivity anomalies 100s of m into the subsurface (Ashadi, 2022), and has produced high‐resolution images of subsurface fluid movement (Neal & Krohn, 2012). The high‐resolution capacity of CSEM can be taken to greater depths by using focused‐source electromagnetics (FSEM), which focuses the EM field vertically and eliminates horizontal electric current density (Davydycheva & Rykhlinski, 2011).…”
Section: Current Approaches To Constrain the Base And Thickness Of Th...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The future of offshore carbon sequestration holds great promise, driven by continuous technological advancements, ongoing research, and collaborative efforts to enhance the efficacy and sustainability of subsurface carbon storage. Future subsurface monitoring will benefit from advancements in seismic imaging technologies, offering higher resolution and real-time data acquisition (Neal and Krohn, 2012). Enhanced seismic tools will enable more accurate assessment of geological structures, improving the reliability of site selection and injection strategies.…”
Section: Future Prospects and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%