2017
DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1324677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher risk of revision for infection using systemic clindamycin prophylaxis than with cloxacillin

Abstract: Background and purposeClindamycin has not been compared with other antibiotics for prophylaxis in arthroplasty. Since 2009, the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register (SKAR) has been collecting information on the prophylactic antibiotic regime used at every individual operation. In Sweden, when there is allergy to penicillin, clindamycin has been the recommended alternative. We examined whether there were differences in the rate of revision due to infection depending on which antibiotic was used as systemic prophy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
20
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a novel finding in the ACLR setting. Robertsson and colleagues 26 reported similar results when analyzing the results after total knee arthroplasty, where clindamycin compared with cloxacillin increased the risk of revision due to infection by 50%. In Sweden, clindamycin is often used when the patient reports an allergy to penicillin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This is a novel finding in the ACLR setting. Robertsson and colleagues 26 reported similar results when analyzing the results after total knee arthroplasty, where clindamycin compared with cloxacillin increased the risk of revision due to infection by 50%. In Sweden, clindamycin is often used when the patient reports an allergy to penicillin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…There are more surgical site infections when penicillins are not used when they are the prophylactic antibiotic of choice. 8,20 There are more deaths and inferior outcomes when penicillins are not used in the setting of methicillinsensitive Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. 3,4 Patients with penicillin allergy spend more time in the hospital, are exposed to significantly more antibiotics associated with Clostridioides difficile and vancomycin-resistant enterococci, and have increased hospital use.…”
Section: Risks Of Not Evaluating Individuals With a Penicillin Allergymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Penicillins often lead to improved outcomes as first-line agents for many infectious disease processes, including dental, skin, and bloodstream infections. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Choosing Wisely, an initiative of the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation, recommends, "Don't overuse non −b-lactam antibiotics in patients with a history of penicillin allergy, without an appropriate evaluation." [9][10][11][12] However, many patients do not undergo evaluation for their penicillin allergy, and exactly what constitutes an appropriate evaluation has changed during the past decade.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors advocated for a universal decolonization protocol involving 25 mL of 4% antimicrobial CHG for 5 days, instead of screening and decolonization with 5 days of intranasal mupirocin (twice daily) and chlorhexidine body wash 22 . Antimicrobial prophylaxis with clindamycin was associated with an increased infection risk compared with cloxacillin and cephalosporins 23 . The use of antimicrobial cement was effective in continued reducing the rate of infection after revision total knee arthroplasty but not primary total knee arthroplasty 24 .…”
Section: Preventionmentioning
confidence: 98%