2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2111.10203
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher Semiadditive Algebraic K-Theory and Redshift

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While we will not prove this here, I want to remark that the Acategory V together with the representable functor U is actually essentially uniquely determined by A: namely, if v ∈ V corepresents U , then (V , v) is the initial example of a locally presentable A-category together with a chosen object. Building on this one can show that as soon as all left adjoint functors between A-categories are A-functors (which is true in all of our examples), V together with the functor S → V left adjoint to U will be a mode in the sense of [CSY20,MS21], and our setup gets a somewhat similar flavour to the theory developed in op. cit.…”
Section: Interlude: Unenriched Morita Theorymentioning
confidence: 68%
“…While we will not prove this here, I want to remark that the Acategory V together with the representable functor U is actually essentially uniquely determined by A: namely, if v ∈ V corepresents U , then (V , v) is the initial example of a locally presentable A-category together with a chosen object. Building on this one can show that as soon as all left adjoint functors between A-categories are A-functors (which is true in all of our examples), V together with the functor S → V left adjoint to U will be a mode in the sense of [CSY20,MS21], and our setup gets a somewhat similar flavour to the theory developed in op. cit.…”
Section: Interlude: Unenriched Morita Theorymentioning
confidence: 68%