2008
DOI: 10.1021/jp801805p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly Accurate First-Principles Benchmark Data Sets for the Parametrization and Validation of Density Functional and Other Approximate Methods. Derivation of a Robust, Generally Applicable, Double-Hybrid Functional for Thermochemistry and Thermochemical Kinetics

Abstract: We present a number of near-exact, nonrelativistic, Born-Oppenheimer reference data sets for the parametrization of more approximate methods (such as DFT functionals). The data were obtained by means of the W4 ab initio computational thermochemistry protocol, which has a 95% confidence interval well below 1 kJ/mol. Our data sets include W4-08, which are total atomization energies of over 100 small molecules that cover varying degrees of nondynamical correlations, and DBH24-W4, which are W4 theory values for Tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

26
801
2
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 724 publications
(833 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
26
801
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…While PARI-K yields impressive accuracy in its own right, the accuracy of occ-RI-K is clearly superior. The errors per electron in the absolute energies of all molecules in the test set are quite 73,74 0.00 0.00 Butanediol65 75 0.00 0.00 BzDC215 76 0.00 0.00 CT20 77 0.00 0.00 DIE60 78 0.00 0.00 DS14 79 0.00 0.01 EA13 80 0.01 0.01 EIE22 81 0.00 0.00 FmH2O10 82,83 0.01 0.16 ACONF 84,85 0.00 0.01 BHPERI 85,86 0.00 0.00 CYCONF 85,87 0.00 0.00 G21EA 85,88 0.00 0.00 G21IP 85,88 0.00 0.00 NBPRC 85 0.00 0.02 WATER27 85,89 0.00 0.03 NHTBH38 85,90 0.01 0.02 HTBH38 85,91 0.00 0.01 BH76RC 85 0.00 0.00 DBH24 86 0.00 0.01 H2O6Bind8 83,92 0.00 0.05 HB15 93 0.00 0.01 HSG 94,95 0.00 0.00 HW30 96 0.00 0.01 HW6Cl 82,83 0.00 0.04 HW6F 82,83 0.00 0.04 IP13 80 0.00 0.00 NBC10 95 0.01 0.01 NC15 97 0.00 0.00 Pentane14 98 0.00 0.01 RG10 99 0.00 0.00 S22 …”
Section: A Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While PARI-K yields impressive accuracy in its own right, the accuracy of occ-RI-K is clearly superior. The errors per electron in the absolute energies of all molecules in the test set are quite 73,74 0.00 0.00 Butanediol65 75 0.00 0.00 BzDC215 76 0.00 0.00 CT20 77 0.00 0.00 DIE60 78 0.00 0.00 DS14 79 0.00 0.01 EA13 80 0.01 0.01 EIE22 81 0.00 0.00 FmH2O10 82,83 0.01 0.16 ACONF 84,85 0.00 0.01 BHPERI 85,86 0.00 0.00 CYCONF 85,87 0.00 0.00 G21EA 85,88 0.00 0.00 G21IP 85,88 0.00 0.00 NBPRC 85 0.00 0.02 WATER27 85,89 0.00 0.03 NHTBH38 85,90 0.01 0.02 HTBH38 85,91 0.00 0.01 BH76RC 85 0.00 0.00 DBH24 86 0.00 0.01 H2O6Bind8 83,92 0.00 0.05 HB15 93 0.00 0.01 HSG 94,95 0.00 0.00 HW30 96 0.00 0.01 HW6Cl 82,83 0.00 0.04 HW6F 82,83 0.00 0.04 IP13 80 0.00 0.00 NBC10 95 0.01 0.01 NC15 97 0.00 0.00 Pentane14 98 0.00 0.01 RG10 99 0.00 0.00 S22 …”
Section: A Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 gathers a summary of existing expression within this category [57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68]; broadly speaking, they differ in: (i) the kernel used to represent the exchange-correlation effects (i.e., B2-PLYP vs. mPW2-PLYP); (ii) the training set used to obtain the value of the {w EXX , w PT2 } weights, which is also related to the nature of the target set and the purpose of the parame- Table 1, it is readily seen how the weight of EXX is always considerably high, compared with the moderate weight for the perturbative term or with corresponding weight in hybrid models, and that a recently highlighted [69] condition such as w PT2 ≤ w EXX 2 , is almost invariably fulfilled independently of the final composition of these DH forms. These features are expected to largely drive the successful performance of the methods studied so far, as we will see next.…”
Section: Construction Of Empirical Functionalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A plethora of investigations already attempted to tune the pair of {a x , a c } parameters entering into Equation (1) via fully empirical [8][9][10][11][12][13] or theoretical [14][15][16][17][18][19] routes. Following this latter line of design, we recently derived these parameters in a nonempirical fashion from the adiabatic connection model, 20 using a quadratic polynomial of the coupling integrand parameter and fixing its coefficients through some known limit conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%