2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcat.2021.111954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly active K-promoted Cu/β-Mo2C catalysts for reverse water gas shift reaction: Effect of potassium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To understand the origin of enhanced catalytic performance of Mo atomic sites compared to that of Mo bulk-based catalysts, we compared Mo/NC with β-Mo 2 C, which has been widely reported for the RWGS reaction among Mobased catalysts, [30,[39][40][41][42] in terms of the reactivity of adsorbed CO which was reported as the key descriptor to affect selective CO formation. [43] We found that the CO* desorption energies from the CO* + OH* + H* reaction on Mo/NC and Mo 2 C(001) surfaces were À 0.47 eV and 1.06 eV, respectively (Figure S15), indicating that CO* can be easily liberated from Mo/NC.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the origin of enhanced catalytic performance of Mo atomic sites compared to that of Mo bulk-based catalysts, we compared Mo/NC with β-Mo 2 C, which has been widely reported for the RWGS reaction among Mobased catalysts, [30,[39][40][41][42] in terms of the reactivity of adsorbed CO which was reported as the key descriptor to affect selective CO formation. [43] We found that the CO* desorption energies from the CO* + OH* + H* reaction on Mo/NC and Mo 2 C(001) surfaces were À 0.47 eV and 1.06 eV, respectively (Figure S15), indicating that CO* can be easily liberated from Mo/NC.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24] To address this issue, we modified CoÀ C with K + which is known to lower the CO binding energy. [25][26][27] The K + À CoÀ C catalyst was prepared by drop-casting KNO 3 into aspyrolyzed CoÀ C and then treating it in H 2 at 500 °C. Increasing the added amount of KNO 3 from 0.2 wt % the mass of as-pyrolyzed CoÀ C to 10 wt % improves CO selectivity while retaining the production rate, whereas further increasing it to 30 wt % does not change the selectivity or activity (Figure S20).…”
Section: Zuschriftenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, K + modification increases the activation energy substantially from 54.3 kJ mol À 1 to 90.0 kJ mol À 1 (Figure S18). This is likely due to suppressed H 2 adsorption, [25][26][27] which is also responsible for the improved selectivity for CO (as opposed to further hydrogenated CH 4 ). Compared with other catalysts, [14,18,20,29] the superior performance of K + À CoÀ C likely originates from its improved photothermal conversion efficiency and increased exposure of Co sites.…”
Section: Zuschriftenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The modification of Mo 2 C with alkali metals changes the structural and electronic properties of these catalysts and promotes the performances of Mo 2 C in CO 2 conversions [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ]. For example, the addition of 2 wt% K to Mo 2 C/γ-Al 2 O 3 increases the CO selectivity to 95% from 73.5% [ 30 ], and the incorporation of K into Cu/Mo 2 C results in high CO 2 dissociation activity (almost 1.5 times higher than Cu/Mo 2 C) but also reduces H 2 adsorption, thus resulting in a low H 2 /CO x ratio and low CH 4 production [ 31 ]. The CO selectivity of Cs-Mo 2 C, which can reach 100% at low-temperatures (400 to 500 °C), is a result of increased electron transfer from Cs to Mo, thus favoring CO selectivity [ 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%