2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.06.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly effective reduction of fecal indicator bacteria counts in an ecologically engineered municipal wastewater and acid mine drainage passive co-treatment system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Strosnider and Nairn 2010;84 Strosnider et al 2011a84 Strosnider et al , 2011b, with a view to implementing this approach at Potosí, Bolivia 85 (Strosnider and Nairn 2010). That work revealed that co-treatment with strongly acidic mine 86 waters enhances the disinfection of sewage effluent (Winfrey et al 2010), and results in impressive removal rates for BOD and phosphorous (Strosnider et al 2011b), and zinc (Strosnider et al 2013), albeit denitrification is apparently inhibited under the conditions studied (Strosnider et al 2011b). Several laboratory-based studies have examined alternative co-treatment options for mine water and sewage, including activated sludge techniques Gray 2012, 2013), and anaerobic digestion (Deng and Lin 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Strosnider and Nairn 2010;84 Strosnider et al 2011a84 Strosnider et al , 2011b, with a view to implementing this approach at Potosí, Bolivia 85 (Strosnider and Nairn 2010). That work revealed that co-treatment with strongly acidic mine 86 waters enhances the disinfection of sewage effluent (Winfrey et al 2010), and results in impressive removal rates for BOD and phosphorous (Strosnider et al 2011b), and zinc (Strosnider et al 2013), albeit denitrification is apparently inhibited under the conditions studied (Strosnider et al 2011b). Several laboratory-based studies have examined alternative co-treatment options for mine water and sewage, including activated sludge techniques Gray 2012, 2013), and anaerobic digestion (Deng and Lin 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One potential issue is whether the high ionic strength of the mine water -and therefore the belend with sewage -might inhibit certain important microbial processes that are important in nutrient removal, particularly of NH 4 -N and PO 4 -P. For instance, the laboratory experiments of Strosnider et al (2011b) indicate potential inhibition of denitrification in blended mine water and sewage. In that case ionic strength was also high, but in addition the mine water was initially very acidic, and this is known to be deleterious to pathogens (Winfrey et al 2010), and thus possibly to other bacteria too. However, as previously noted, the mine waters treated at Lamesley are of neutral pH.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passive co-treatment of MWW and AMD in a multi-stage system consistently achieved high BOD and nutrient removal efficiency (Strosnider et al 2011b), removed significant concentrations of dissolved Al, As, Cd, Fe, Mn, Pb, and Zn, and produced a net-alkaline effluent (Strosnider et al 2011a). Other recent reports of passive co-treatment indicated that AMD enhanced coagulation, sedimentation, and pathogen removal during wastewater treatment (Neto et al 2010;Winfrey et al 2010). Johnson and Younger (2006) reported removal of Fe and Mn from net-alkaline coal mine AMD, as well as phosphate, nitrate, and suspended solids removal, in a wetland co-treating AMD with secondary sewage effluent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Techniques like the co-treatment of municipal wastewater (with biosolids as byproducts) and AMD has recently gained popularity following its introduction by Roetman [39], when it was proposed to remove pathogens in sewage [40]. Results from studies to date have shown the removal of metals, certain nutrients, increases in pH and alkalinity, and overall water/leachates quality improvements [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%