2021
DOI: 10.1007/s13204-021-01795-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly effective removal of presence of toxic metal concentrations in the wastewater using microalgae and pre-treatment processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At day 3, 0.45 g/L, 0.6 g/L, 0.5 g/L, 0.4 g/L, and 0.33 g/L dry biomass were produced for the wastewater samples L0:P100, L25:P75, L50:P50, L75:P25, and L100:P0. Compared to day 3, day 9 reported massive growth in the microalgae 21%, 15.3%, 18.1%, 22%, and 30.7% [8,9]. From the findings, it is clear that industry leather wastewater produced higher dry biomass compared to the piggery wastewater.…”
Section: Effects Of Wastewater Concentration On Microalgaementioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At day 3, 0.45 g/L, 0.6 g/L, 0.5 g/L, 0.4 g/L, and 0.33 g/L dry biomass were produced for the wastewater samples L0:P100, L25:P75, L50:P50, L75:P25, and L100:P0. Compared to day 3, day 9 reported massive growth in the microalgae 21%, 15.3%, 18.1%, 22%, and 30.7% [8,9]. From the findings, it is clear that industry leather wastewater produced higher dry biomass compared to the piggery wastewater.…”
Section: Effects Of Wastewater Concentration On Microalgaementioning
confidence: 90%
“…At the final moment of day 15, the respective lipid content of the samples is 1.5%, 1.75%, 1.3%, 1.01%, and 0.98%, respectively. Lipid content was dramatically improved when they are cultivated in the leather wastewater than piggery [9,22]. The main reason for the better lipid productivity for the leather WW was absorbed nutrients.…”
Section: Effects Of Wastewater Concentration On Microalgaementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Biomass accumulation, through the removal of nutrients present in W through the use of microalgae, was the objective of researchers such as Fan et al (2023), Paulenco et al (2023), Liu et al (2023), Zhuang et al (2023), Zuo et al (2023), , Qv et al (2023) and Muthuraman et al (2023). The microalgae species used were Chlorella sp., Nannochloris sp., Hybrid, Chlorella FACHB-30, Chlorella FACHB-5, Chlorella vulgaris, Chlorella sorokiniana and Coelastrella sp.…”
Section: Reference Content Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%